Skip to main content Scroll Top

AI SEO Agency Chicago: The Most Valuable Click and the Easiest Term

Updated September 2026 · Written and maintained by the Progression Agency strategy team

We measured the Chicago SERP in September 2026. It carries the highest cost per click of the twelve cities we checked, the lowest SEO difficulty, and no Chicago agency has built the page for it.

On this page · 10 sections
  1. Chicago has the most valuable click and the easiest term of the twelve cities
  2. We got this SERP wrong in an earlier draft, and re-measured it
  3. The Chicago-and-AI field is genuinely unclaimed
  4. No AI Overview here, which changes the order of the work
  5. What we would do for a Chicago business, in order
  6. What we will not claim about Chicago
  7. One national agency holds the top of nearly every city SERP
  8. The measured data, in full
  9. Everything else we have written on search, AI and getting found
  10. Video: local search, listings and AI results

The short answerChicago is the highest-value, lowest-difficulty market in our research. ‘seo agency chicago’ measures 880 monthly searches at $68.44 a click — five times Los Angeles — on an SEO difficulty of 32, the softest of the twelve. The reason those coexist is who is on the page: a national agency at position one, two directories at two and three, a local pack at four to six, and the first genuinely Chicago-and-AI page down at seven on a domain authority 12 site. There is no AI Overview here, so the Business Profile and the page decide visibility. ‘ai seo agency chicago’ measures zero searches.

Every figure on this page was pulled from the Ubersuggest API, US location, on 17 September 2026 and carries that date. An earlier unpublished draft of this page described Chicago as a directory-led SERP with Clutch at position one; re-measuring disproved that and the page was rebuilt. Cost per click moves with the ad market — re-measure before relying on it.

Chicago has the most valuable click and the easiest term of the twelve cities

$68.44 a click on an SEO difficulty of 32, and no Chicago agency has built the page for it.

The click is worth five times a Los Angeles click

‘seo agency chicago’ carries a $68.44 cost per click against $13.40 in Los Angeles and $14.89 in Atlanta. Cost per click is what advertisers have collectively decided a customer from that query is worth, and in Chicago that figure is the highest of the twelve cities we measured. Dallas, at $56.07, is the only one close.

And the term is the easiest of the twelve

SEO difficulty 32, against 40 in Austin and Phoenix and 41 in Los Angeles, Philadelphia and Dallas. Volume is modest at 880 searches a month, but difficulty measures how contested the ranking is, not how large it is, and 32 is the softest number in this research.

The explanation is who is on the page, not how many

Position one is thriveagency.com at domain authority 49 — a national agency, not a Chicago firm. Positions two and three are BuiltIn Chicago at 66 and Clutch at 71. Then a local pack takes four to six. The first page that is genuinely about Chicago and AI search is teramok.us at position seven, domain authority 12.

We got this SERP wrong in an earlier draft, and re-measured it

Worth saying plainly, because it is the reason to trust the numbers that follow.

The first version of this page described Chicago as directory led

It said five of the top seven results were directories and put Clutch at position one with a domain authority of 91. When we re-pulled the result set on 17 September 2026, none of that held: Clutch is domain authority 71 and sits at position three, and there is a local pack at four to six that the earlier draft did not have at all.

It was never published

The correction happened before the page went live, which is the only reason it is a footnote rather than an apology. We are describing it because a page that publishes other people’s measurements should be willing to say when its own were wrong.

Every figure here now comes from one dated pull

17 September 2026, Ubersuggest API, US location. The full result set for all twelve cities is in the tables below, including the positions we are not flattered by.

The full result set for all twelve cities is in the tables below, including the positions we are not flattered by.

The Chicago-and-AI field is genuinely unclaimed

The two pages holding it are domain authority 12 and 16.

teramok.us at position seven

A page at /chicago/ai-seo-agency from a domain authority 12 site. It ranks above digitalthirdcoast.com at DA 49 and 1digitalagency.com at DA 41, both of which are stronger domains with Chicago pages. It ranks because it is specifically about this query and they are not.

qoulomb.com at position eight

A listicle — ‘5 Best AI SEO Agencies In Chicago’ — from a domain authority 16 site. Worth noting because it is a roundup rather than a service page, and roundups are reachable: being considered for one is cheaper than outranking it.

And the deepest relevant result set in the study

Chicago still returns genuinely relevant results at position twenty-four, where amwidigitalacademy.com at domain authority 6 holds an /ai-seo-agency-chicago/ page. Compare Philadelphia and Atlanta, where Google runs out of relevant results at position nine and starts serving Guardian articles about AI. Chicago has depth; it just has no strong local claimant.

No AI Overview here, which changes the order of the work

Four of the twelve cities served one. Chicago did not.

So the map pack is where visibility is decided first

Positions four, five and six are a local pack — onechicagoseocompany.com, base64marketing.com and seodesignchicago.com. Three Chicago businesses are visible above every AI-specific page on the SERP purely through Google Business Profile. That is the cheapest visible position in this market and the first thing we would fix.

Then the page, because the bar is domain authority 16

In Austin, where an Overview sits above everything, we would do answer-first editing before publishing anything. Here there is no Overview to be a source for, so the page itself is the asset and it only has to be better than a DA-16 listicle and a DA-12 service page.

Answer-first editing still matters, just not first

Assistants answer questions about Chicago agencies whether or not Google shows an Overview on this particular query. Rewriting headings so each is answered in its first two sentences — the approach in our content rules — is cheap and compounds. It is fourth in Chicago rather than second.

Assistants answer questions about Chicago agencies whether or not Google shows an Overview on this particular query.

What we would do for a Chicago business, in order

Access, profile, page, roundups, editing.

Access and rendering, because nothing works without them

Confirm AI crawlers can reach the site and that content exists without JavaScript. Our robots.txt checker and JavaScript SEO checker both run in your browser and cost nothing. Assistants and crawlers read text; a page that renders only in a browser is invisible to both.

The Business Profile, completed properly

Three pack slots sit above every AI-specific result. Complete the profile, pick categories that match what people type, and collect reviews with descriptive text rather than bare stars — a star rating with no words helps neither Google’s ordering nor an assistant summarising you.

One Chicago page that beats a DA-16 bar

That is a low bar and it will not stay low in a market with $68.44 clicks. What we would publish is what this page is: the measured numbers, who ranks and at what authority, and what the composition implies. If we could not say something specific about Chicago we would not publish a Chicago page.

Then the roundups, then the editing

qoulomb’s ‘5 Best AI SEO Agencies In Chicago’, digitalthirdcoast’s ‘Top 8 SEO Agencies in Chicago That Are Actually Local’ and dabaran’s piece on Chicago agencies adapting to AI are all reachable domains between DA 16 and DA 49. Being considered for inclusion costs an email. Outranking BuiltIn Chicago at 66 costs a year.

What we will not claim about Chicago

Three statements that would help us and would not be true.

That we rank here

We do not appear anywhere in this result set. Progression is domain authority 4 and based in Sunnyside, New York. The tables below measure other people’s positions.

That the $68.44 click is revenue you will capture

It is a paid-search figure. It tells you what the market believes a Chicago client is worth, which is genuinely useful for deciding how much being visible is worth spending on. It is not a projection of what you will earn.

That the AI term has hidden Chicago volume

It measures zero. Read that as below the tool’s measurement floor rather than as literally nobody, and treat any specific figure quoted for it as invented.

Read that as below the tool’s measurement floor rather than as literally nobody, and treat any specific figure quoted for it as invented.

One national agency holds the top of nearly every city SERP

The clearest finding in the twelve-city measurement, and it is not about Chicago.

thriveagency.com appears in nine of the twelve cities

Position one in Chicago, Phoenix, Philadelphia and Atlanta. Position three in Dallas, four in Austin and Houston, seven in Los Angeles. Absent in Seattle, Boston and Denver. One national agency, at domain authority 49, has systematically taken the city terms across the country.

agencies.semrush.com sits at two to six in ten of twelve

A directory at domain authority 86, consistently just below or just above the national agency. Between them, those two domains occupy a top-five position in every city we measured except Seattle.

Which tells you what a city page is competing with

Not a local rival. A national agency page and a directory listing, neither of which is specifically about your city’s AI search market. That is the argument for a city page that actually says something measured about the city — and it is the same argument in all nine markets, which is why we are comfortable making it here.

The measured data, in full

Everything above comes from these tables. They were pulled on 17 September 2026 and carry that date so you can judge how stale they are when you read this.

What currently ranks for ‘ai seo agency chicago’, measured September 2026
PositionDomainDAResult typePage
1thriveagency.com49organic/chicago-seo-company/
2builtinchicago.org66organic/articles/chicago-seo-agency-sem
3clutch.co71organic/seo-firms/chicago
4onechicagoseocompany.com—local pack/
5base64marketing.com—local pack/
6seodesignchicago.com—local pack/
7teramok.us12organic/chicago/ai-seo-agency
8qoulomb.com16organic/best-ai-seo-agencies-in-chicago/
9digitalthirdcoast.com49organic/blog/top-seo-agencies-local-to-chicago
111digitalagency.com41organic/seo-by-city/chicago-seo-agency/
12yourportalonline.com16organic/ai-seo-services/
13adcetera.com36organic/chicago-seo-agency
14dabaran.com28organic/how-chicago-seo-agencies-are-adapting-to-the-rise-of-ai-in-search/
17sixthcitymarketing.com69organic/chicago-seo/
24amwidigitalacademy.com6organic/ai-seo-agency-chicago/
Measured demand in Chicago, September 2026
KeywordMonthly searchesCPCSEO difficultyIntent
seo agency chicago880$68.4432Commercial
ai seo agency chicago0—5—
Every city we measured, September 2026
City‘seo agency [city]’ volCPCSD‘ai seo agency [city]’ volLowest DA in the top tenDA
Austin4,400$28.12400aicoads.com7
Los Angeles2,400$13.40410seotuners.com19
Miami1,900$17.00430kiaora.digital10
Phoenix1,900$20.41400localfiseo.com10
Philadelphia1,300$20.23410phillyseo.ai5
Boston1,000$30.89380weframetech.com14
Dallas1,000$56.07410qoulomb.com16
Chicago880$68.44320teramok.us12
Houston590$21.68390directoryone.com25
Denver590$32.07370thebrandsmen.com25
Seattle480$15.08370vertigroupinternational.com20
Atlanta210$14.89380wislr.com11
One national agency holds the top of most city SERPs, September 2026
Citythriveagency.com positionagencies.semrush.com positionLocal pack positionsAI OverviewResults turn generic
Austin436-8yesno
Los Angeles783-5yesat 16
Miami784-6yesno
Phoenix121-3nono
Philadelphia125-7yesat 9
Bostonabsent4 (AI list)noneyesno
Dallas325-7nono
Chicago1absent4-6nono
Houston451-3nono
Denverabsent6 (AI list)3-5nono
Seattleabsentabsent2-4nono
Atlanta12noneyesat 9
Where each SERP runs out of relevant results, September 2026
CityLast relevant positionWhat Google falls back toWhat it means
Philadelphia9The Guardian, Gates Notes, NYT, DARPA, YouTube, r/agencyNine relevant results, then nothing local left to show
Atlanta9YouTube, GAO, The Guardian, Gates Notes, DARPANine relevant results, and no local pack at all
Los Angeles16YouTube, GAO, The GuardianSixteen relevant results in the second-largest market on the list
Chicago24+None in the range measuredRelevant results as deep as position twenty-four
Austin, Dallas, Phoenix, Seattle, Houston18+None in the range measuredNo fallback observed inside the range we pulled
Miami, Boston, Denver10-17None in the range measuredNo fallback observed, though we pulled these three less deeply

Want this done for your site?We build and maintain the search, content and paid programmes described on this page.

Get a free proposal

Everything else we have written on search, AI and getting found

AI, AEO and what is changing

Websites and design

Choosing and working with an agency

Social, content and brand

By industry and by situation

Want the same measurement for your own market

We will pull the SERP, the authority of everyone in it and the demand on both terms for your city, and tell you honestly whether it is worth a page yet. One of the twelve we measured carries 210 searches a month, and we say so on its page.

/contact

Not sure which of these applies to you?Tell us the situation and we will say plainly what we would do first, and what we would not.

Talk it through

Video: local search, listings and AI results

Background viewing only. Every measurement on this page is our own and is written out in full above.

Getting found in search

AI, AEO and what is changing

Paid media and lead generation

Websites and design

Choosing and working with an agency

Social, content and brand

By industry and by situation

Cost per click across the twelve cities we measured
A Chicago click costs five times a Los Angeles click. That is what the ad market believes a Chicago client is worth, and it is the single most useful number on this page.
Chicago is expensive and easy at the same time
Los Angeles is the opposite shape: cheap clicks, hard term, big volume, and a result set that collapses into general AI journalism by position seventeen. Chicago stays relevant to position twenty-four.
Why an expensive click sits on an easy term here
The most valuable click in the study is being answered by a national agency, two directories and a map. No Chicago agency has built the page for it.
What the Chicago result set is actually made of
Five yeses and three noes. The two that matter are the last two: no strong local competitor, and no traffic yet either.
What we would do for a Chicago business
The order differs from Austin because Chicago serves no AI Overview. Without one, the map pack and the page are where visibility is decided, and answer-first editing drops to fourth.
Where the twelve cities sit on value against difficulty
Bottom-right is the best square on this chart: high client value, low ranking difficulty. Chicago sits there alone, and nothing else is close.
Chicago, in numbers
Highest value, lowest difficulty, and the best Chicago-specific effort so far is a domain authority 12 page. That combination does not appear anywhere else in the study.

Frequently asked questions

How much does an SEO agency click cost in Chicago?
‘seo agency chicago’ measured a $68.44 cost per click in September 2026 — the highest of the twelve cities we measured, and roughly five times the Los Angeles figure of $13.40.
How hard is it to rank for SEO terms in Chicago?
SEO difficulty 32, the lowest of the twelve cities. That is unusual next to the highest cost per click in the study, and the reason is who is on the page rather than how many.
Who ranks first for ‘ai seo agency chicago’?
thriveagency.com, at domain authority 49, with /chicago-seo-company/. It is a national agency rather than a Chicago firm, and it holds position one in four of the twelve cities we measured.
Is the Chicago SERP dominated by directories?
No, and an earlier draft of this page said it was. Re-measuring on 17 September 2026 showed a national agency at one, BuiltIn Chicago and Clutch at two and three, and a local pack at four to six. Clutch is domain authority 71, not 91, and has never held position one in any city we checked.
Does ‘ai seo agency chicago’ get any searches?
No. It measured zero, with an SEO difficulty of 5. The demand is entirely on the established term at this point.
What is the best Chicago-specific AI page currently ranking?
teramok.us at domain authority 12, with /chicago/ai-seo-agency at position seven. It outranks two domains above DA 40 that have Chicago pages, because it is specifically about this query and they are not.
Should I try to outrank Clutch or BuiltIn Chicago?
No. Clutch is DA 71 and BuiltIn Chicago is 66. Being listed inside them is achievable; outranking them is not, and trying is the most common waste of budget in a market like this.
What should a Chicago business do first?
Confirm crawler access and rendering, then complete the Google Business Profile. Three local pack slots sit above every AI-specific result on this SERP, and that is the cheapest visible position in the market.
Is there an AI Overview on this query in Chicago?
No. Austin, Los Angeles, Miami, Boston, Philadelphia and Atlanta served one when we measured; Chicago, Dallas, Phoenix, Houston, Denver and Seattle did not.
Why does that change the plan?
Where an Overview sits above the results, the first question is whether you are a source, so answer-first editing comes first. Without one, the map pack and the page decide visibility, and editing drops to fourth.
How deep do relevant results run in Chicago?
To position twenty-four, where a domain authority 6 site holds an /ai-seo-agency-chicago/ page. That is the second-deepest of the twelve. In Philadelphia and Atlanta, Google runs out at position nine and starts serving general articles about AI.
Which Chicago roundups are worth approaching?
qoulomb’s ‘5 Best AI SEO Agencies In Chicago’ at DA 16, digitalthirdcoast’s ‘Top 8 SEO Agencies in Chicago That Are Actually Local’ at DA 49, and dabaran’s piece on Chicago agencies adapting to AI at DA 28. All three are reachable domains.
Does the $68.44 click mean I will make that much?
No. It is a paid-search figure showing what the market believes a Chicago client is worth. It is useful for deciding how much visibility is worth spending on, not a revenue projection.
Does zero volume mean nobody searches the AI term?
It means below the tool’s measurement floor. Treat it as too small to measure rather than nonexistent, and treat any specific figure quoted for it as invented.
Does Progression rank for these Chicago terms?
No. We appear nowhere in this result set. The tables measure other people’s positions and are published because they are useful.
What is the single most useful finding across all twelve cities?
That thriveagency.com, one national agency at domain authority 49, holds a top-four position in seven of the twelve and position one in four of them. A city page is usually competing with a national agency and a directory rather than with a local rival.
How does Chicago compare with the other cities?
Highest cost per click, lowest difficulty, second-deepest relevant result set, and no strong local claimant on the AI term. No other city in the study has that combination.
Is a city page enough on its own?
No. It is one page on one query. The Business Profile, access, rendering and answer-first structure across the site all sit around it.
How often should this be re-measured?
Quarterly. Cost per click moves with the ad market, AI Overview presence is unstable, and the AI-modified field is changing fastest of all.
Do you work with businesses outside New York?
Yes. We are based in Sunnyside, New York, and the search work is not geographically constrained. The Business Profile work is the part that depends on where your customers are.
What would tell me this is working in Chicago?
Map pack impressions first, because that is the fastest-moving signal. Then impressions on the parent term, then whether recorded assistant answers start naming you. The AI-term position is the cheapest to get and the last to matter.
Where did these numbers come from?
The Ubersuggest API, US location, pulled on 17 September 2026. The full twelve-city dataset is in the tables above.

Sources and further reading

  1. Google Search Essentials — SEO starter guide
  2. Google: creating helpful, reliable, people-first content
  3. Google: intro to structured data
  4. Google: LocalBusiness structured data
  5. Google: FAQPage structured data
  6. Google: Article structured data
  7. Google: Product structured data
  8. Google: title links in search results
  9. Google: control your snippets
  10. Google: robots.txt introduction
  11. Google: sitemaps overview
  12. Google: consolidate duplicate URLs
  13. Google: redirects and Search
  14. Google: JavaScript SEO basics
  15. Google: multi-regional and multilingual sites
  16. Google Search Central Blog
  17. Google: get started with Search Console
  18. Google: how local search results are determined
  19. Google Business Profile: prohibited and restricted content
  20. Google Business Profile: address and service area guidelines
  21. Google Business Profile: review policy
  22. Google Business Profile: add or edit categories
  23. Google Ads: location targeting settings
  24. Google Ads: about negative keywords
  25. Google Ads: about Quality Score
  26. Google Ads: importing offline conversions
  27. Google Ads: about Smart Bidding
  28. Google Ads: about Performance Max
  29. Google Local Services Ads: eligibility and screening
  30. Google Ads: keyword match types
  31. Google Analytics 4: about conversions
  32. Google Analytics 4: attribution models
  33. US Census Bureau QuickFacts: New Jersey
  34. US Census Bureau: American Community Survey
  35. US Census: Statistics of US Businesses
  36. Bureau of Labor Statistics: New Jersey data
  37. BLS: Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics
  38. NJ Department of Labor: labor market information
  39. New Jersey Business Action Center
  40. US Small Business Administration: New Jersey district
  41. USA.gov: business resources
  42. web.dev: Core Web Vitals explained
  43. web.dev: Largest Contentful Paint
  44. web.dev: Cumulative Layout Shift
  45. web.dev: Interaction to Next Paint
  46. Google PageSpeed Insights
  47. Google Rich Results Test
  48. Google Search Console
  49. W3C Markup Validation Service
  50. Schema.org: LocalBusiness type
  51. Schema.org: Service type
  52. Schema.org: FAQPage type
  53. Schema.org: HowTo type
  54. W3C: WCAG 2.2 quick reference
  55. FTC: CAN-SPAM Act compliance guide
  56. FCC: telemarketing and robocall rules (TCPA)
  57. FTC endorsement guides — reviews and testimonials
  58. FTC: rule on consumer reviews and testimonials
  59. HHS: HIPAA guidance on online tracking technologies
  60. New Jersey Courts: attorney advertising guidelines
  61. New Jersey DCA: construction codes and permits
  62. New Jersey Home Improvement Contractor registration
  63. New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs
  64. TikTok for Business
  65. TikTok Creative Center
  66. TikTok Ads Help Center
  67. TikTok Community Guidelines
  68. TikTok Terms of Service
  69. TikTok Privacy Policy
  70. TikTok Safety Center
  71. TikTok Transparency Center
  72. TikTok Creator Portal
  73. TikTok Newsroom
  74. TikTok for Developers
  75. TikTok advertising solutions
  76. TikTok Creator Marketplace
  77. TikTok Business Center
  78. TikTok for Business blog
  79. TikTok Creative Center: top ads
  80. TikTok Branded Content policy
  81. TikTok Shop for sellers
  82. Instagram for Business
  83. Instagram for Creators
  84. Instagram Help Center
  85. About Instagram
  86. Meta Business Suite
  87. Meta Business Help Center
  88. Meta Transparency Center
  89. About Meta
  90. Meta: Instagram platform docs
  91. YouTube Creators
  92. YouTube Official Blog
  93. YouTube Shorts help
  94. How YouTube Works
  95. YouTube Studio
  96. LinkedIn Marketing Solutions
  97. LinkedIn Help
  98. Pinterest Business
  99. Pinterest Business Help
  100. Snapchat for Business
  101. X for Business
  102. Reddit communities
  103. Reddit for Business Help
  104. ASCAP
  105. BMI
  106. SESAC
  107. Global Music Rights
  108. PRS for Music (UK)
  109. PPL (UK)
  110. SOCAN (Canada)
  111. APRA AMCOS (Australia)
  112. GEMA (Germany)
  113. SACEM (France)
  114. SIAE (Italy)
  115. JASRAC (Japan)
  116. IFPI
  117. RIAA
  118. National Music Publishers Association
  119. Harry Fox Agency
  120. SoundExchange
  121. Music Reports
  122. Epidemic Sound
  123. Artlist
  124. Soundstripe
  125. PremiumBeat
  126. AudioJungle
  127. Free Music Archive
  128. Creative Commons
  129. Incompetech
  130. FTC: advertising and marketing
  131. FTC: disclosures 101
  132. FTC: endorsement guides
  133. FTC: consumer reviews rule
  134. FTC: advertising FAQs
  135. US Copyright Office
  136. US Copyright Office: DMCA
  137. US Copyright Office: music FAQ
  138. US Copyright Office: fair use FAQ
  139. USPTO: trademarks
  140. UK Advertising Standards Authority
  141. ACCC (Australia)
  142. Competition Bureau Canada
  143. GDPR overview
  144. California Consumer Privacy Act
  145. COPPA
  146. FTC: children’s privacy
  147. W3C Web Accessibility Initiative
  148. W3C: WCAG
  149. W3C: captions
  150. W3C: making audio and video accessible
  151. ADA.gov
  152. WebAIM
  153. Epilepsy Foundation
  154. Pew Research: internet and technology
  155. DataReportal
  156. US Census Bureau
  157. US Bureau of Labor Statistics
  158. Interactive Advertising Bureau
  159. Think with Google
  160. Google Trends
  161. Nielsen insights
  162. Schema.org: VideoObject
  163. Schema.org: SocialMediaPosting
  164. Schema.org: MusicRecording
  165. Schema.org: HowTo
  166. Schema.org: FAQPage
  167. Schema.org: Organization
  168. Google: video best practices
  169. Google: video structured data
  170. CapCut
  171. Adobe Premiere Rush
  172. DaVinci Resolve
  173. Canva
  174. Descript
  175. VEED
  176. Kapwing
  177. Otter.ai
  178. Later
  179. Buffer
  180. Hootsuite
  181. Sprout Social
  182. Google Analytics
  183. Google Search Console
  184. Google Analytics developer docs
  185. GA4: events and conversions
  186. Matomo
  187. Plausible Analytics
  188. Similarweb
  189. UK Information Commissioner’s Office
  190. Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
  191. Australian OAIC
  192. European Data Protection Board
  193. EU data protection
  194. EU Digital Services Act
  195. Ofcom
  196. FCC
  197. AIGA
  198. Nielsen Norman Group
  199. Smashing Magazine
  200. web.dev
  201. MDN: web media
  202. MDN: the video element
  203. ISO 21001 (reference)
  204. Buma/Stemra (Netherlands)
  205. STIM (Sweden)
  206. Teosto (Finland)
  207. Koda (Denmark)
  208. TONO (Norway)
  209. IMRO (Ireland)
  210. SGAE (Spain)
  211. ZAiKS (Poland)
  212. KOMCA (South Korea)
  213. MCSC (China)
  214. CISAC
  215. World Intellectual Property Organization
  216. TikTok: creating videos
  217. TikTok: exploring videos
  218. TikTok: privacy settings
  219. TikTok: growing your audience
  220. TikTok Creator Academy
  221. TikTok Effect House
  222. TikTok for small business
  223. Instagram: Reels help
  224. YouTube: Shorts best practice
  225. How YouTube recommends
  226. Pinterest Predicts
  227. Snapchat for Business
  228. Hootsuite blog
  229. Social Media Examiner
  230. Marketing Week
  231. Adweek
  232. Google Search Essentials — SEO starter guide
  233. Google: creating helpful, reliable, people-first content
  234. Google: intro to structured data
  235. Google: LocalBusiness structured data
  236. Google: FAQPage structured data
  237. Google: Article structured data
  238. Google: Product structured data
  239. Google: title links in search results
  240. Google: control your snippets
  241. Google: robots.txt introduction
  242. Google: sitemaps overview
  243. Google: consolidate duplicate URLs
  244. Google: redirects and Search
  245. Google: JavaScript SEO basics
  246. Google: multi-regional and multilingual sites
  247. Google Search Central Blog
  248. Google: get started with Search Console
  249. Google: how local search results are determined
  250. Google Business Profile: prohibited and restricted content
  251. Google Business Profile: address and service area guidelines
  252. Google Business Profile: review policy
  253. Google Business Profile: add or edit categories
  254. web.dev: Core Web Vitals explained
  255. web.dev: Largest Contentful Paint
  256. web.dev: Cumulative Layout Shift
  257. web.dev: Interaction to Next Paint
  258. Google PageSpeed Insights
  259. Google Rich Results Test
  260. Google Search Console
  261. W3C Markup Validation Service
  262. Schema.org: LocalBusiness type
  263. Schema.org: Service type
  264. Schema.org: FAQPage type
  265. Schema.org: HowTo type
  266. W3C: WCAG 2.2 quick reference
  267. US Census Bureau QuickFacts: New Jersey
  268. US Census Bureau: American Community Survey
  269. US Census: Statistics of US Businesses
  270. Bureau of Labor Statistics: New Jersey data
  271. BLS: Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics
  272. NJ Department of Labor: labor market information
  273. New Jersey Business Action Center
  274. US Small Business Administration: New Jersey district
  275. USA.gov: business resources
  276. Google – Business Profile guidelines
  277. Google – LocalBusiness structured data

Want this done for your site?We build and maintain the search, content and paid programmes described on this page.

Get a free proposal

Get a free marketing proposal

Tell us what you are trying to grow and we will come back with a plan, not a pitch deck. Same-day reply on weekdays.

Our website uses cookies from third party services to improve your browsing experience. Read more about this and how you can control cookies by clicking "Privacy Preferences".
Privacy Preferences
When you visit our website, it may store information through your browser from specific services, usually in form of cookies. Here you can change your privacy preferences. Please note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our website and the services we offer.
Privacy Policy
You have read and agreed to our privacy policy
Required
Contact Us