Scroll Top

B2B PR Agency: What Actually Moves a Deal

Updated September 2026 · Written and maintained by the Progression Agency strategy team

B2B public relations fails in a predictable way: the board asks for national business coverage, the agency delivers it, and nothing happens in the pipeline. The reason is that a B2B purchase is made by a committee of five to ten people who read trade publications, listen to industry analysts, and need internal evidence to justify a decision they are already leaning toward. Coverage rarely originates those deals. It removes the reasons a committee would say no — which is a less flattering job and a far more valuable one.

The short answerLead with trade press, not national press. Treat analyst relations as part of the remit rather than an adjacent discipline, because analysts brief your buyers directly. Publish original data, which is the single most pitchable asset a B2B company can produce. Place executive bylines that make one falsifiable argument and mention no products. Expect six to nine months before pipeline influence is visible, and a retainer between roughly $3,500 and $20,000 a month. Measure share of voice in the trades, analyst mentions, and whether sales can point to coverage that was used inside a deal. Never measure impressions.

B2B public relations, in outline
B2B PR is a different job from consumer PR, and the difference is the audience. You are trying to reach a small number of people who already read a small number of publications.

Why B2B public relations is a different job

Answer first: because the audience is a buying committee of a few people rather than a market of a few million, and those people read a small, identifiable set of publications. Reach stops being the objective and relevance takes over entirely.

What makes B2B PR different from consumer PR
The row about the buying committee drives everything else. Five to ten people have to agree, each reads different things, and coverage is often used internally to justify a decision rather than to originate it.

The committee is the unit, not the person

Five to ten people typically have to agree on a significant B2B purchase, and they read different things and worry about different risks. A technical evaluator wants to know the architecture holds up; a finance signatory wants to know you will still exist in three years; a procurement lead wants to recognize the name. Coverage that satisfies one of them and not the others still leaves the deal blocked.

Coverage is used internally, not just externally

The most common real-world use of B2B coverage is a champion inside an account forwarding it to colleagues as evidence. This is invisible in analytics and it is where a large share of the value sits. It also explains why trade coverage frequently outperforms national coverage: the champion is forwarding something their colleagues already respect.

Sales cycles are measured in quarters

Consumer PR can produce a measurable spike within days. In B2B, coverage published in March may be cited in a deal that closes in November. Any measurement framework that expects a same-month response will conclude the program is failing, which is why the first question a good agency asks is how long your deals take.

Where the effort actually pays

Answer first: trade press, analyst relations, original data and executive bylines. National business press scores highest on reach and lowest on deal influence, which is precisely the trap.

Where B2B PR effort actually pays
National business press scores highest on reach and lowest on deal influence, which is exactly the trap: it is the coverage boards ask for and the coverage least likely to move a purchase.
Trade publications — Channel. Read by the actual buyer.
Industry analysts — Channel. De-risk the purchase.
Executive bylines — Channel. Slow authority, compounds.
Original research — Channel. The most pitchable asset.
Conference speaking — Channel. Where committees gather.
Customer case studies — Channel. Proof procurement accepts.
B2B PR channels, honestly compared
ChannelWho it reachesEffect on a dealTime to first resultMain cost
Trade pressThe buying committee directlyHigh6-10 weeksAgency time
Analyst relationsAnalysts who brief your buyersHighOne to two quartersSenior time
Original dataTrades, analysts and buyers at onceHigh3-4 monthsResearch effort
Executive bylinesPractitioners in your categoryModerate6-12 weeksExecutive time
Conference speakingCommittees, in one roomModerateTwo to three quartersTravel and prep
National business pressA broad audience, mostly irrelevantLowUnpredictableHigh effort
AwardsProcurement and internal championsLow but realMonthsAdministration

Why national coverage disappoints so reliably

It is the coverage boards ask for and the coverage least likely to be read by anyone in your buying committee. It is genuinely useful for recruitment, fundraising and internal morale, and those are legitimate reasons to want it. Just do not expect it to move a pipeline, and do not let it be the measure of the program.

Analyst relations, which most B2B firms neglect

Answer first: industry analysts brief your buyers directly, often at the exact moment a shortlist is formed. An agency that has never run a briefing is missing the half of B2B communications that most reliably de-risks a purchase.

Research who covers your category — Analyst. Not every analyst does.
Request a briefing, not a review — Analyst. Different conversation.
Bring data, not slides — Analyst. They test claims.
Answer the hard question — Analyst. Evasion is remembered.
Follow up with substance — Analyst. Quarterly, not weekly.
Paid inclusion is separate — Analyst. Know which is which.

A briefing is not a review

Requesting a briefing means asking for time to explain what you do and answer questions. It is not a request to be included in a report, and treating it as one is the fastest way to be remembered badly. Bring data, expect the claims to be tested, and answer the hard question directly.

Know which parts are paid

Some analyst interactions are free and editorial; others are commercial subscriptions or sponsored placements. Both are legitimate, but conflating them in a report to your own board is not. Be explicit internally about which mentions were earned and which were purchased.

Original data, the strongest pitch available to a B2B company

Answer first: numbers nobody else has give a journalist a reason to write rather than a request to. Survey your own customers, analyze your own telemetry with consent, or re-cut a public dataset nobody has bothered with.

Survey your own customers — Data. Cheapest original data.
Analyze your product telemetry — Data. With consent, anonymised.
Re-cut public datasets — Data. Legitimate and under-used.
State the methodology — Data. Editors will ask.
Publish the raw numbers — Data. Builds citation over time.
Repeat it annually — Data. A benchmark beats a one-off.

State the methodology, always

Trade editors will ask how many respondents, drawn from where, over what period. A study that cannot answer those questions does not get run, and a study that answers them badly gets run once and never cited again. Publishing the raw numbers alongside the write-up is what turns a one-off into something people link to for years.

Repeat it annually

A single study is a story. The same study run each year becomes a benchmark, and a benchmark gets cited without you pitching it. This is the highest-compounding activity in B2B communications and it is usually abandoned after one cycle because the second year feels less exciting internally.

Executive bylines that editors will actually run

Answer first: one argument, made by a named executive, that is specific enough to be wrong, with no product mentions, offered exclusively. Bylines are declined far more often for being vague than for being badly written.

One argument per piece — Byline. Not a company overview.
Written by the named executive — Byline. Ghosted, but their view.
No product mentions — Byline. Trades reject them.
Specific and falsifiable — Byline. Vague pieces get declined.
Offered exclusively — Byline. Simultaneous pitches burn editors.
Reused internally — Byline. Sales will send it.

Specific enough to be wrong

A piece arguing that the industry should think carefully about data governance says nothing. A piece arguing that a particular common practice is about to become untenable, and giving the reason, is a position an editor can publish and readers can disagree with. Only the second kind gets accepted.

No product mentions, and mean it

Trade editors accept bylines because the byline gives their readers something useful. A product reference converts the piece into advertising and it will either be cut or the piece will be declined. Take the credibility instead; sales can send the article afterwards.

What is genuinely a story, and what is not

Answer first: original data, a named customer outcome with numbers, a real category shift, a defensible contrarian position, and a partnership that changes something. Not your roadmap, and not a logo swap.

Original data you gathered — Story. Strongest pitch there is.
A named customer outcome — Story. With permission and numbers.
A genuine category shift — Story. Not your product roadmap.
A contrarian executive view — Story. Defensible, not provocative.
Funding, briefly — Story. One news cycle only.
A partnership that changes something — Story. Not a logo swap.
Chasing national features — Avoid. Reach without relevance.
Impressions as a metric — Avoid. Measures nothing here.
Product news with no news — Avoid. Trades will not run it.
Jargon in the release — Avoid. Editors delete it.
Ignoring analysts — Avoid. They brief your buyers directly.
One spokesperson only — Avoid. Committees want specialists.
Announcements ranked by whether a trade will actually run them
AnnouncementWill a trade run it?How to improve the odds
Original researchAlmost alwaysPublish the methodology and the raw data
Named customer outcome with figuresUsuallyGet the customer to speak on record
Genuine category shiftUsuallyBring evidence beyond your own view
Funding roundOne cycle, brieflyTie it to a specific plan, not a valuation
Significant partnershipSometimesSay what changes for customers
Senior hireRarely, outside the tradesOnly where the person is genuinely known
Product releaseRarelyLead with the problem, not the feature list
Award winAlmost neverUse it on your own channels instead

How coverage actually shows up inside a deal

Answer first: a champion searches your name, finds trade coverage and an analyst mention, and uses both to build an internal case. The decision is rarely attributed to PR and is frequently enabled by it.

How coverage actually shows up in a B2B deal

Absence hurts more than presence helps

This is the asymmetry that makes B2B PR worth funding. A committee encountering nothing when it searches a vendor’s name treats that as a risk signal. The program’s job is often to make sure the search returns something credible, rather than to generate a moment.

What it costs and how long it takes

Answer first: roughly $3,500 a month for a freelance specialist up to $20,000 for a technology practice, and six to nine months before pipeline influence is visible. The ramp is longer than consumer PR because the sales cycle it supports is longer.

What B2B PR retainers cost
A B2B retainer buys narrower reach than a consumer one at a similar price. That is not poor value; it is that the audience is a few thousand people rather than a few million.
A realistic first nine months
What each retainer level typically covers
LevelRoughly per monthTypically includesTypically excludes
Freelance specialist$3,000-$4,500One beat, trade pitching, bylinesAnalyst relations, crisis cover
Boutique B2B firm$6,000-$9,000Media relations, content, awardsAnalyst relations at depth
Mid-size specialist$10,000-$15,000Adds analyst relations and research24-hour issues cover
Technology practice$16,000-$25,000Multiple products and marketsPaid media
Issues standby$7,000-$12,000Availability and a written planOrdinary media relations
Project, one launch$15,000-$50,000 totalA defined announcementAnything after it ends

Why project engagements rarely work here

Three months is not long enough to build trade relationships, brief an analyst or run a data study, and it is far shorter than the sales cycle the work is meant to support. Projects make sense for a specific announcement and almost never as a test of whether B2B PR works.

What you have to supply

Answer first: access to engineers, the roadmap under embargo, approvals inside the news cycle, customers willing to speak, early warning of bad quarters, and a connection between the PR function and the sales team.

Give access to engineers — Client side. Trades interrogate claims.
Share the roadmap under embargo — Client side. Agencies plan around it.
Approve within the news cycle — Client side. Hours, not days.
Let customers speak — Client side. The hardest and most valuable.
Tell them about the bad quarter — Client side. Before a journalist does.
Connect PR to sales — Client side. Otherwise nothing is measurable.

Customer references are the hardest and most valuable input

A named customer describing a specific outcome with a number attached outperforms every other asset a B2B company can produce. Getting one requires a real relationship and usually a legal conversation, and firms that treat it as an afterthought spend years without one.

Connect PR to sales or nothing is measurable

If nobody asks in a sales call whether the prospect had seen anything about you, the program cannot be evaluated. One question added to a discovery call produces more useful measurement than any reporting dashboard.

B2B technology PR, which has its own problems

Answer first: technology is the sector where B2B technology public relations diverges most from the general practice, because the trade press is genuinely technical, the analyst landscape is crowded, and claims get tested by people who can read the documentation.

What changes when a B2B public relations agency works in technology
FactorGeneral B2BB2B technology PRWhat it means in practice
Trade pressBusiness-focusedOften written by practitionersVague claims are caught immediately
AnalystsA handful per categoryMany firms, tieredMapping matters more than volume
SpokespersonCommercial leadFrequently an engineerMedia training for people who dislike it
ClaimsBroadly acceptedTested against documentationMarketing language becomes a liability
Announcement cadenceQuarterlyContinuous release cyclesMost releases are genuinely not news
Competitive comparisonRareExpectedBenchmarks need methodology published
Security incidentsOccasionalA standing riskA written plan is not optional

Why B2B technology PR needs people who can read the docs

An agency that cannot follow your technical documentation will write a release your own engineers will not sign off, and will put a spokesperson in front of a journalist who knows the subject better than they do. When evaluating a b2b technology PR partner, hand them a technical page from your site and ask what it says.

Choosing a B2B public relations agency for a technical category

The useful screening question is not which brands they have worked with but whether they can explain, in their own words, what problem your product solves and who currently solves it differently. A B2B public relations agency that cannot do that after reading your site will spend your first two months learning at your expense.

Security incidents and issues, which technology companies cannot avoid

Answer first: have the plan written before it is needed, name one prepared spokesperson, state what is known and what is not, never speculate on cause, and update on a stated cadence. Silence is read as concealment by exactly the buyers you most need to keep.

The first twenty-four hours of a disclosed incident
HourWhat to doWhat not to do
0-1Confirm the facts internallyPublish anything
1-3Publish a holding statementSpeculate on cause or scale
3-6Notify affected customers directlyLet them read it in the press first
6-12Brief the trade press and analystsGo quiet while you investigate
12-24Post the first substantive updatePromise a timeline you cannot meet
OngoingUpdate on a stated cadenceStop updating once attention fades
AfterPublish what changedTreat communication as the remedy

Your buyers are watching how you behave, not just what happened

In B2B, an incident handled openly frequently costs less trust than a smaller one handled badly, because the committee is assessing whether you would tell them next time. That assessment is the thing communications can genuinely influence.

Measurement that survives a board meeting

Answer first: share of voice in the trades against named competitors, analyst mentions and their sentiment, coverage cited inside deals, inbound from target accounts, and message pull-through. Impressions measure nothing in a market of a few thousand buyers.

Share of voice in trades — Measure. Against named rivals.
Analyst mentions — Measure. Count and sentiment.
Coverage cited in deals — Measure. Ask the sales team.
Inbound from target accounts — Measure. Not total traffic.
Message pull-through — Measure. Did the framing survive.
Never impressions — Measure. It measures nothing.
What to report, and what a bad number means
MeasureWhat it answersA bad number usually means
Share of voice in tradesAre we present where buyers readWrong beats, or nothing worth saying
Analyst mentionsAre we in the shortlist conversationNo briefing program exists
Coverage cited in dealsDid it help sell anythingPR and sales are not connected
Inbound from target accountsDid the right people noticeReach without relevance
Message pull-throughDid our framing surviveThe positioning is unclear
Byline acceptance rateAre the arguments strong enoughPieces are too vague
ImpressionsNothing usefulIt is being reported to fill space

Choosing a B2B PR agency

Answer first: ask about your sales cycle, ask them to name analysts covering your category, ask whether they can read your technical documentation, and ask who signs the purchase order in a typical deal. A firm that leads with national press logos is selling a consumer practice.

Signs a B2B PR firm is worth hiring
Asking about the sales cycle is the tell. A firm that does not know whether your deals take six weeks or six quarters cannot sequence anything usefully.
  1. Write down who is on the buying committee and what each one worries about
  2. List the five publications those people actually read
  3. Ask three agencies to name analysts covering your category
  4. Ask each how long they think your sales cycle is, before telling them
  5. Ask what original data they would run in the first six months
  6. Ask who will staff the account and whether they have covered this sector
  7. Agree the approval chain and how fast it can move
  8. Connect the program to a question on the sales discovery call
  9. Budget nine months before judging pipeline influence
  10. Report share of voice and analyst mentions, never impressions

Working out whether you need B2B PR or something else?

A good deal of what B2B companies want from PR is actually demand generation, and a good deal of what they need from marketing is genuinely PR. We are happy to say which one your problem is, including when the answer is neither.

Talk to us

Frequently asked questions about B2B PR agencies

Communications, B2B marketing and measurement talks from their publishers

Publicly available sessions on public relations, B2B marketing and measurement. None of these are ours; each is credited to its channel by name and upload date, every identifier was checked live before publication, and each tile loads its player only when clicked.

Getting found in search

AI, AEO and what is changing

Paid media and lead generation

Websites and design

Choosing and working with an agency

Social, content and brand

By industry and by situation

B2B tech PR as a distinct specialism

B2B tech PR is the most defined sub-specialism inside B2B public relations, and it operates differently enough to be worth naming. B2B tech PR agencies work a press corps — trade titles, analyst firms, developer and practitioner publications, industry newsletters — that has little overlap with consumer media and responds to different material. Funding rounds, product architecture, benchmark data, security disclosures and customer deployments are the currency; founder profiles and lifestyle angles mostly are not. A B2B tech PR firm’s real asset is analyst relations alongside press, because in enterprise categories an analyst’s view shapes shortlists more directly than an article does. A B2B PR firm without that side of the practice can still earn coverage, but will not move the evaluation stage. When comparing, ask which analysts they brief and how often, because it is checkable and it is the part that is hardest to build.

Frequently asked questions

What does a B2B PR agency do?
It earns coverage in the trade publications your buyers read, runs briefings with the industry analysts who advise them, places executive bylines, produces original data worth writing about, and prepares your people for scrutiny. The objective is removing reasons a buying committee would say no.
How is B2B public relations different from consumer PR?
The audience is a buying committee of five to ten people rather than a mass market, so relevance replaces reach as the objective. Trade press outranks national press, analyst relations becomes part of the remit, and results are measured over quarters rather than days.
What does a B2B PR agency cost?
Roughly $3,000 to $4,500 a month for a freelance specialist, $6,000 to $9,000 for a boutique firm, $10,000 to $15,000 for a mid-size specialist including analyst relations, and $16,000 upwards for a technology practice covering several products or markets.
How long before B2B PR affects pipeline?
Six to nine months. The first trade placements usually appear around month three, analyst briefings take a quarter or two to arrange, and coverage published in one quarter is frequently cited in a deal that closes two or three quarters later.
Why did our national press coverage not produce leads?
Because almost nobody in your buying committee read it. National business press is genuinely useful for recruitment, fundraising and morale, and it is the coverage least likely to reach the people who sign a purchase order in your category.
What is analyst relations and do we need it?
It is the practice of briefing the industry analysts who advise buyers, often at the moment a shortlist is being formed. If your category has analysts covering it, yes. They influence purchases more directly than most journalists do.
What is the difference between an analyst briefing and a review?
A briefing is time to explain what you do and answer questions. It is not a request to be included in a report. Treating it as one is the quickest way to be remembered badly by somebody who advises your buyers.
Are analyst reports paid for?
Some interactions are editorial and free; others are commercial subscriptions or sponsored placements. Both are legitimate. What is not legitimate is presenting a purchased mention to your own board as though it were earned.
What should a B2B PR agency actually announce?
Original research, a named customer outcome with figures, a genuine category shift, a defensible contrarian argument, and partnerships that change something for customers. Product roadmaps and award wins are rarely stories outside your own channels.
Why do trade publications reject our product announcements?
Usually because the announcement leads with features rather than a problem, and because nothing in it is new to the readership. Lead with what changes for the reader, and accept that most releases are genuinely not news.
What is original data and why does it matter so much?
Numbers nobody else has: a survey of your own customers, analysis of your product telemetry with consent, or a fresh cut of a public dataset. It gives a journalist a reason to write rather than a request to, and it is the strongest pitch a B2B company can make.
How do we run research a trade publication will take seriously?
State the methodology plainly, say how many respondents and from where, publish the raw numbers alongside the write-up, and repeat it annually. The repetition is what turns a story into a benchmark that gets cited without pitching.
Why was our executive byline declined?
Almost always because it was too vague. Editors accept a piece that makes one specific argument somebody could disagree with. A general reflection on an industry theme gives their readers nothing and gets passed over.
Can a byline mention our product?
No, and attempting it will get the piece cut or declined. The byline earns credibility; sales can send the published article afterwards, which is more effective than a product mention would have been anyway.
Who should be our spokesperson in B2B?
Several people, not one. Committees want to hear from the specialist relevant to their concern: an engineer on architecture, a finance lead on commercial terms, the chief executive on direction. A single spokesperson across all of it reads as marketing.
How do we measure B2B PR?
Share of voice in the trades against named competitors, analyst mentions and sentiment, coverage cited inside deals, inbound enquiries from target accounts, message pull-through and byline acceptance rate. Not impressions.
Why are impressions a bad metric here?
Because your market is a few thousand people. A number in the millions describes an audience that cannot buy from you, and reporting it tends to mean there was nothing more meaningful to report.
How do we know if coverage helped a deal?
Add one question to the sales discovery call asking whether they had come across anything about you. Without that, the internal forwarding of coverage that does most of the work stays invisible and the program cannot be evaluated.
Should we do a three-month project instead of a retainer?
Only for a specific announcement. Three months is not long enough to build trade relationships, arrange analyst briefings or run a data study, and it is far shorter than the sales cycle the work is meant to support.
What should we ask a B2B PR agency before hiring?
How long they think your sales cycle is, which analysts cover your category by name, whether they can read your technical documentation, who signs a purchase order in a typical deal, and what original data they would run in the first six months.
Is B2B PR worth it for a small company?
The underlying work is, even if a retainer is not. A clear message, one piece of original data, two executive bylines and relationships with three trade editors are achievable in-house and are most of what an agency would build first.
Do we need PR if we already do demand generation?
They solve different problems. Demand generation creates enquiries; PR removes the reasons a committee blocks the resulting deal. Companies with strong demand generation and no credible public record tend to see deals stall late rather than early.
What is the most common mistake in B2B PR?
Judging the program on national coverage the buying committee never reads, while the trade press and analysts who actually influence the purchase are left uncovered because they feel less impressive to report internally.
How much executive time does B2B PR require?
More than most companies expect: briefings, bylines, interviews and analyst calls all need a senior person who understands the product. Agencies fail more often on lack of access to engineers and executives than on poor pitching.
What makes B2B tech PR different from general B2B PR?
The press corps and the currency. B2B tech PR agencies work trade titles, analyst firms, developer publications and industry newsletters, and pitch funding, architecture, benchmark data, security disclosures and deployments — not founder profiles. Analyst relations sits alongside press, and in enterprise categories it shapes shortlists more directly than coverage does.
What should I ask a B2B tech PR firm before hiring?
Which analysts they brief and how often, which specific journalists at which titles they have placed in your category in the last year, and who would actually work the account. All three are checkable, and the analyst answer is the one that is hardest to fake.

Sources and further reading

  1. Google Search Essentials — SEO starter guide
  2. Google: creating helpful, reliable, people-first content
  3. Google: intro to structured data
  4. Google: LocalBusiness structured data
  5. Google: FAQPage structured data
  6. Google: Article structured data
  7. Google: Product structured data
  8. Google: title links in search results
  9. Google: control your snippets
  10. Google: robots.txt introduction
  11. Google: sitemaps overview
  12. Google: consolidate duplicate URLs
  13. Google: redirects and Search
  14. Google: JavaScript SEO basics
  15. Google: multi-regional and multilingual sites
  16. Google Search Central Blog
  17. Google: get started with Search Console
  18. Google: how local search results are determined
  19. Google Business Profile: prohibited and restricted content
  20. Google Business Profile: address and service area guidelines
  21. Google Business Profile: review policy
  22. Google Business Profile: add or edit categories
  23. Google Ads: location targeting settings
  24. Google Ads: about negative keywords
  25. Google Ads: about Quality Score
  26. Google Ads: importing offline conversions
  27. Google Ads: about Smart Bidding
  28. Google Ads: about Performance Max
  29. Google Local Services Ads: eligibility and screening
  30. Google Ads: keyword match types
  31. Google Analytics 4: about conversions
  32. Google Analytics 4: attribution models
  33. US Census Bureau QuickFacts: New Jersey
  34. US Census Bureau: American Community Survey
  35. US Census: Statistics of US Businesses
  36. Bureau of Labor Statistics: New Jersey data
  37. BLS: Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics
  38. NJ Department of Labor: labor market information
  39. New Jersey Business Action Center
  40. US Small Business Administration: New Jersey district
  41. USA.gov: business resources
  42. web.dev: Core Web Vitals explained
  43. web.dev: Largest Contentful Paint
  44. web.dev: Cumulative Layout Shift
  45. web.dev: Interaction to Next Paint
  46. Google PageSpeed Insights
  47. Google Rich Results Test
  48. Google Search Console
  49. W3C Markup Validation Service
  50. Schema.org: LocalBusiness type
  51. Schema.org: Service type
  52. Schema.org: FAQPage type
  53. Schema.org: HowTo type
  54. W3C: WCAG 2.2 quick reference
  55. FTC: CAN-SPAM Act compliance guide
  56. FCC: telemarketing and robocall rules (TCPA)
  57. FTC endorsement guides — reviews and testimonials
  58. FTC: rule on consumer reviews and testimonials
  59. HHS: HIPAA guidance on online tracking technologies
  60. New Jersey Courts: attorney advertising guidelines
  61. New Jersey DCA: construction codes and permits
  62. New Jersey Home Improvement Contractor registration
  63. New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs
  64. TikTok for Business
  65. TikTok Creative Center
  66. TikTok Ads Help Center
  67. TikTok Community Guidelines
  68. TikTok Terms of Service
  69. TikTok Privacy Policy
  70. TikTok Safety Center
  71. TikTok Transparency Center
  72. TikTok Creator Portal
  73. TikTok Newsroom
  74. TikTok for Developers
  75. TikTok advertising solutions
  76. TikTok Creator Marketplace
  77. TikTok Business Center
  78. TikTok for Business blog
  79. TikTok Creative Center: top ads
  80. TikTok Branded Content policy
  81. TikTok Shop for sellers
  82. Instagram for Business
  83. Instagram for Creators
  84. Instagram Help Center
  85. About Instagram
  86. Meta Business Suite
  87. Meta Business Help Center
  88. Meta Transparency Center
  89. About Meta
  90. Meta: Instagram platform docs
  91. YouTube Creators
  92. YouTube Official Blog
  93. YouTube Shorts help
  94. How YouTube Works
  95. YouTube Studio
  96. LinkedIn Marketing Solutions
  97. LinkedIn Help
  98. Pinterest Business
  99. Pinterest Business Help
  100. Snapchat for Business
  101. X for Business
  102. Reddit communities
  103. Reddit for Business Help
  104. ASCAP
  105. BMI
  106. SESAC
  107. Global Music Rights
  108. PRS for Music (UK)
  109. PPL (UK)
  110. SOCAN (Canada)
  111. APRA AMCOS (Australia)
  112. GEMA (Germany)
  113. SACEM (France)
  114. SIAE (Italy)
  115. JASRAC (Japan)
  116. IFPI
  117. RIAA
  118. National Music Publishers Association
  119. Harry Fox Agency
  120. SoundExchange
  121. Music Reports
  122. Epidemic Sound
  123. Artlist
  124. Soundstripe
  125. PremiumBeat
  126. AudioJungle
  127. Free Music Archive
  128. Creative Commons
  129. Incompetech
  130. FTC: advertising and marketing
  131. FTC: disclosures 101
  132. FTC: endorsement guides
  133. FTC: consumer reviews rule
  134. FTC: advertising FAQs
  135. US Copyright Office
  136. US Copyright Office: DMCA
  137. US Copyright Office: music FAQ
  138. US Copyright Office: fair use FAQ
  139. USPTO: trademarks
  140. UK Advertising Standards Authority
  141. ACCC (Australia)
  142. Competition Bureau Canada
  143. GDPR overview
  144. California Consumer Privacy Act
  145. COPPA
  146. FTC: children’s privacy
  147. W3C Web Accessibility Initiative
  148. W3C: WCAG
  149. W3C: captions
  150. W3C: making audio and video accessible
  151. ADA.gov
  152. WebAIM
  153. Epilepsy Foundation
  154. Pew Research: internet and technology
  155. DataReportal
  156. US Census Bureau
  157. US Bureau of Labor Statistics
  158. Interactive Advertising Bureau
  159. Think with Google
  160. Google Trends
  161. Nielsen insights
  162. Schema.org: VideoObject
  163. Schema.org: SocialMediaPosting
  164. Schema.org: MusicRecording
  165. Schema.org: HowTo
  166. Schema.org: FAQPage
  167. Schema.org: Organization
  168. Google: video best practices
  169. Google: video structured data
  170. CapCut
  171. Adobe Premiere Rush
  172. DaVinci Resolve
  173. Canva
  174. Descript
  175. VEED
  176. Kapwing
  177. Otter.ai
  178. Later
  179. Buffer
  180. Hootsuite
  181. Sprout Social
  182. Google Analytics
  183. Google Search Console
  184. Google Analytics developer docs
  185. GA4: events and conversions
  186. Matomo
  187. Plausible Analytics
  188. Similarweb
  189. UK Information Commissioner’s Office
  190. Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
  191. Australian OAIC
  192. European Data Protection Board
  193. EU data protection
  194. EU Digital Services Act
  195. Ofcom
  196. FCC
  197. AIGA
  198. Nielsen Norman Group
  199. Smashing Magazine
  200. web.dev
  201. MDN: web media
  202. MDN: the video element
  203. ISO 21001 (reference)
  204. Buma/Stemra (Netherlands)
  205. STIM (Sweden)
  206. Teosto (Finland)
  207. Koda (Denmark)
  208. TONO (Norway)
  209. IMRO (Ireland)
  210. SGAE (Spain)
  211. ZAiKS (Poland)
  212. KOMCA (South Korea)
  213. MCSC (China)
  214. CISAC
  215. World Intellectual Property Organization
  216. TikTok: creating videos
  217. TikTok: exploring videos
  218. TikTok: privacy settings
  219. TikTok: growing your audience
  220. TikTok Creator Academy
  221. TikTok Effect House
  222. TikTok for small business
  223. Instagram: Reels help
  224. YouTube: Shorts best practice
  225. How YouTube recommends
  226. Pinterest Predicts
  227. Snapchat for Business
  228. Hootsuite blog
  229. Social Media Examiner
  230. Marketing Week
  231. Adweek
  232. FTC — the Endorsement Guides: what people are asking
  233. SEC EDGAR — company filings
  234. US Bureau of Labor Statistics — public relations specialists
  235. PR Newswire — news releases
  236. Business Wire — newsroom

Get a free marketing proposal

Tell us what you are trying to grow and we will come back with a plan, not a pitch deck. Same-day reply on weekdays.

Our website uses cookies from third party services to improve your browsing experience. Read more about this and how you can control cookies by clicking "Privacy Preferences".
Privacy Preferences
When you visit our website, it may store information through your browser from specific services, usually in form of cookies. Here you can change your privacy preferences. Please note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our website and the services we offer.
Privacy Policy
You have read and agreed to our privacy policy
Required