Skip to main content Scroll Top

AEO Services: The Eight Things You Actually Receive

Updated September 2026 · Written and maintained by the Progression Agency strategy team

Answer engine optimization sold as artefacts rather than activities — the reports, rewrites and baselines you keep, and how to verify every one of them yourself.

On this page · 15 sections
  1. What AEO services actually deliver
  2. What is included, and what is deliberately not
  3. How the work is sequenced across six months
  4. The two tests that happen before we quote
  5. How each deliverable is evidenced
  6. What the structural work actually changes on a page
  7. Which services you actually need
  8. Is this market open to a smaller supplier?
  9. What it costs
  10. Everything else we have written on search, AI and getting found
  11. The deliverables, with the evidence that proves each one
  12. In scope, out of scope, and the one genuinely blurred line
  13. How AEO services differ from the SEO services you may already buy
  14. Service levels, and who each one suits
  15. Video: AI search, crawlers and measurement

The short answerAEO services deliver eight artefacts in six weeks: a crawler access report from your server logs, a robots audit, a render report per template, a dated prompt baseline, passage rewrites, an entity sheet, a schema diff, and monthly measurement against that baseline. Every one is independently checkable. Not included: article volume, keyword research, rank tracking or any guarantee of citation. Two tests before quoting decide the scope — scriptless rendering, and your robots.txt against the AI crawler list.

Search volumes, CPC and domain authority figures measured September 2026. Published pricing bands are attributed on our AEO pricing page.

What you receive, week by week
Eight artefacts. Every one is a file you keep, and every one is checkable by someone else.

What AEO services actually deliver

Eight artefacts in the first six weeks, and every one of them is a file you keep and can check yourself: a crawler access report from your server logs, a robots audit, a render report per template, a dated prompt baseline, passage rewrites, an entity sheet, a schema diff, and then a monthly measurement against the baseline.

That list is deliberately concrete because this discipline has an evidence problem. A great deal of what is sold as answer engine optimization arrives as a dashboard and a narrative. Neither can be verified by anyone other than the supplier who produced it.

Note what is not on the list. No content calendar, no keyword map, no rank report. Those belong to a different channel, and two of them actively make AEO performance worse.

Access report — Artefact. AI crawler hits from your logs, by bot, with status codes.
Render report — Artefact. Scripted vs scriptless word count, per template.
Prompt baseline — Artefact. Fixed wording, verbatim answers, dated.
Passage rewrites — Artefact. Before and after, section by section.
Entity sheet — Artefact. One description, plus every source contradicting it.
Schema diff — Artefact. What the markup claims versus what the page says.

The crawler access report

A table from your own logs showing which AI bots requested which URLs, what status code they got, and how often. It is the only way to know whether access is real rather than theoretical, and you can re-run it without us.

The render report

Every commercial template fetched twice — once as a browser, once with scripts disabled — with the word counts side by side. This single document usually explains why a site is absent from AI answers.

The prompt baseline

A fixed set of buyer questions, run once, with the verbatim answers stored and dated. Without this, nothing claimed later can be proven, because answers vary between runs and memory is not evidence.

The passage rewrites

Before and after, section by section. The change is almost always the same: move the answer to the first sentence of the section that promises it.

The entity sheet

One canonical description of the business, plus a list of every source currently contradicting it. Tedious work that stops assistants saying wrong things about you.

The schema diff

What your structured data claims, set against what the visible page actually says. Markup that contradicts the copy is worse than no markup at all.

What is included, and what is deliberately not

In scope: crawler access, rendering diagnosis, passage restructuring, schema reconciliation, entity consistency, corroboration and prompt-set measurement. Out of scope: article volume, keyword research, rank tracking and any form of guarantee.

The honest boundary is rendering implementation. We specify the fix and test it, but actually changing how your application renders is usually an engineering job that belongs with your developers. Pretending otherwise is how AEO quotes become wrong by an order of magnitude.

What is in scope and what is not
The ‘part’ row is the honest one: we specify the rendering fix and test it, but implementation usually belongs with your engineers, and that changes the price substantially.
Article volume — Not included. Publishing more is not the lever here.
Keyword research — Not included. No ranked list means no per-keyword target.
Rank tracking — Not included. Cannot see inside an answer.
Guarantees — Not included. Nobody controls model output.
Paid placement — Not included. No inventory exists to buy.
Engineering delivery — Not included. We specify and test; your devs usually implement.

How the work is sequenced across six months

Front-loaded and cheapest-first. Month one is access and baseline, month two is rendering, months three to five are structure, entity and corroboration, and month six is the first point at which the measurement says anything reliable.

The shape of the hours inverts over that period. Month one is overwhelmingly technical; by month six most of the effort is corroboration, which is the slowest signal and the one with the longest half-life.

A six-month engagement, month by month
Month six is the first point at which citation frequency says anything reliable. Any supplier claiming a verdict in month two is reading variance.
Where the hours go in an AEO service month
The shape inverts over six months. Front-loaded technical work gives way to corroboration, which is the slow half and the durable one.

The two tests that happen before we quote

We fetch your commercial templates with JavaScript disabled, and we read your robots.txt against the current AI crawler list. Both take an afternoon, and together they decide the scope and therefore the price.

This is not a courtesy. Rendering health is the single largest cost variable in an AEO engagement, and a quote produced without testing it is a guess with a number attached.

The two tests we run before quoting
We do not quote before these. A price produced without them is a guess dressed as a proposal.
Robots.txt — Technical. Allow the five crawlers that matter.
Rendering — Technical. Content must survive without JavaScript.
Status codes — Technical. 403s and soft 404s to AI bots are common and invisible.
Redirects — Technical. Chains lose retrieval more often than they lose rankings.
CDN and WAF — Technical. Bot protection blocks AI crawlers by default more often than you think.
Log access — Technical. Without it, crawler claims are unprovable.

How each deliverable is evidenced

Every artefact is independently checkable. Log extracts you can re-run, word counts you can reproduce with a single command, verbatim stored answers, and links to the actual third-party pages rather than a count of them.

We are explicit about this because the failure mode in AEO reporting is not dishonesty so much as irreproducibility. Answers vary between runs, so a screenshot proves nothing and a citation count with no stored answers cannot be audited by anyone, including us.

How each deliverable is evidenced
Every green row is independently checkable. That is deliberate: this discipline has a fabrication problem, and stored verbatim answers are the cure.
Citation frequency — Measured. How often you are named across the prompt set.
Share of voice — Measured. You versus competitors in the same answers.
Sentiment — Measured. How you are described, not just whether.
Prompt coverage — Measured. Which buyer questions you appear on at all.
Crawler hits — Measured. Whether access is real, from logs.
Render coverage — Measured. Templates a machine can actually read.

Why verbatim answers are stored

Non-determinism is real. The same prompt can return different sources an hour apart. Storing the answer text is the only way to distinguish a genuine change from variance.

Why the prompt wording is fixed

Changing a single word changes which sources are retrieved. A prompt set that drifts produces a trend line that means nothing.

Why rankings are reported separately

Merging them is how weak AEO work hides behind ordinary search gains. If the two are on the same chart, one of them is decoration.

Why we report sentiment, not just presence

Being described wrongly is worse than being absent. A brand named alongside an inaccurate claim has a problem a citation count will never surface.

What the structural work actually changes on a page

One thing, mostly: the answer to a heading moves into the first sentence of the section that promises it. Retrieval selects passages, so an answer assembled across three paragraphs and a bullet list has nothing clean to lift.

The secondary changes are comparisons expressed as tables, definitions stated plainly rather than approached gradually, and numbers carrying their sources inline. All three survive summarisation better than prose does.

Heading answers itself — Structure. First sentence of the section resolves the heading.
One idea per section — Structure. Retrieval lifts a passage, not a page.
Tables for comparisons — Structure. Extract cleanly and survive summarisation.
Definitions stated plainly — Structure. Definition prompts are the highest-citation query type.
Numbers with sources — Structure. Unsourced statistics are the first thing dropped.
No answer split across sections — Structure. The commonest structural failure we find.

The commonest structural failure

The heading asks a question and the section answers it in paragraph four, after context. Human readers tolerate this. Retrieval does not.

Why tables extract well

A table row is already a self-contained fact with its dimensions labelled. It is close to the shape retrieval wants.

Why definitions matter disproportionately

Definition prompts are among the highest-citation query types, because a model answering ‘what is X’ needs a clean sentence to quote.

Why unsourced numbers get dropped

A statistic without attribution is the first thing a cautious model declines to repeat. Sourcing inline is cheap insurance.

Which services you actually need

Not every site needs the full programme. If your category is question-led and your site blocks machines, you need all of it. If demand is brand-led and the site is readable, you need a baseline and very little else this year.

We give the second answer regularly. It is a poor sales tactic and an accurate one.

Which services you actually need
Bottom-left is a real answer and we give it. If demand is brand-led and the site is readable, there is nothing here worth buying this year.
Best fit — B2B SaaS. Long research cycles, assistant-using buyers.
Best fit — Professional services. Question-led, high-value discovery.
Best fit — Healthcare. Question-shaped demand; wrong answers carry real risk.
Best fit — Fintech. Comparison-heavy, corroboration-sensitive.
Best fit — Manufacturing. Specification queries suit passage retrieval.
Poor fit — Local trades. Listings and reviews still return more today.

Full retainer

Question-led category, real technical debt. Everything in the deliverables list.

Audit plus fixes

Question-led category, clean site. Buy the diagnosis and the structural work, skip the retainer until there is something to measure monthly.

Technical sprint only

Brand-led demand but machines are blocked. Fix access and rendering, then stop. It is cheap and it removes a genuine risk.

Baseline and monitor

Clean site, brand-led demand. Record a prompt set, check it monthly, and spend the budget somewhere it returns more this year.

Is this market open to a smaller supplier?

Right now, yes, unusually so. A DA-7 domain holds a position on the second page for ‘aeo services’, a term with a $38 cost per click, and the median page-one domain authority is around thirty.

That is a window rather than a permanent condition. Established brands are still treating AEO as a blog subject rather than a service line, which is why specialists with modest authority are currently outranking them.

Domain authority currently ranking for 'aeo services'
A DA-7 domain holds a position on page two of a commercial term with a $38 cost per click. This family is genuinely open right now.
Cost per click on the AEO services family
Cost per click is the market pricing the intent. At $25-$70 a click these are buyers, not researchers.

What it costs

Published US retainers for this work run roughly $1,500 to $20,000 a month and a one-off audit $1,000 to $4,000. Your number depends on template count and rendering health far more than on the market.

Buy the audit first unless you already know your rendering is clean. It converts assumptions into a scope, and it occasionally concludes that you do not need the rest.

What an AEO service is actually optimising toward
Two tests decide the price, eight artefacts prove the work, and nothing can be bought. That is the whole commercial shape of this service.

Start with the two tests

We will fetch your commercial templates with JavaScript disabled and check your robots.txt against the current AI crawler list, then tell you what we found — including if the honest answer is that you do not need a retainer this year.

/ai-visibility-audit

Want this done for your site?We build and maintain the search, content and paid programmes described on this page.

Get a free proposal

Everything else we have written on search, AI and getting found

AI, AEO and what is changing

Websites and design

Choosing and working with an agency

Social, content and brand

By industry and by situation

Not sure which of these applies to you?Tell us the situation and we will say plainly what we would do first, and what we would not.

Talk it through

The deliverables, with the evidence that proves each one

Eight deliverables, each paired with the artefact that proves it was actually done.

Every artefact and how you check it yourself
DeliverableWhenWhat you receiveHow you verify it independently
Crawler access reportWeek 1Log table by bot, URL and status codeRe-run the same grep on your own logs
Robots auditWeek 1Scored robots.txt plus exact lines to changeRead the file; the change is visible
Render reportWeek 2Scripted vs scriptless word count per templatecurl the URL with scripts off and count
Prompt baselineWeek 2Fixed prompts, verbatim answers, datedAsk the same prompts yourself
Passage rewritesWeeks 3-5Before and after, section by sectionRead both; the change is obvious
Entity sheetWeeks 4-6One description plus contradicting sourcesVisit the sources listed
Schema diffWeek 6Markup claims vs visible copyRun any schema validator
Monthly measurementOngoingCitation frequency, share of voice, sentimentCompare against the stored baseline

In scope, out of scope, and the one genuinely blurred line

What an AEO engagement covers, what it does not, and the single boundary that is genuinely ambiguous.

What an AEO service does and does not cover
AreaIncludedWhy
Crawler access and robotsYesThe cheapest fix in the discipline
Render diagnosis per templateYesThe largest cost variable
Render implementationUsually notTypically an engineering job for your developers
Passage restructuringYesRetrieval selects passages, not pages
Schema reconciliationYesContradictory markup is worse than none
Entity consistencyYesStops assistants being wrong about you
Third-party corroborationYesThe slow half, and the durable one
Prompt-set measurementYesThe only honest way to measure this channel
High-volume article productionNoVolume is not the lever here
Keyword researchNoThere is no ranked list to target
Rank tracking as the KPINoCannot see inside an answer
Guaranteed citationsNoNobody controls model output

How AEO services differ from the SEO services you may already buy

The overlap is larger than most providers admit, and these are the lines where the work genuinely diverges.

Same supplier category, different unit of work
DimensionSEO serviceAEO service
Unit of workThe page and the keywordThe passage and the template
Primary evidenceRank reportsServer logs, scriptless fetches, stored answers
Main monthly outputContent and linksStructural fixes and a re-run prompt set
Crawlers consideredGooglebot, BingbotPlus GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended
JavaScript toleranceUsually renderedFrequently not executed at all
Success measurePosition in a listNamed or not named
Time to first signalWeeks to monthsDays for access, months for citations

Service levels, and who each one suits

Three levels of engagement compared on scope, cadence and the kind of business each fits.

Four shapes this engagement takes
ShapeSuitsContainsStops when
Audit onlyClean site, cautious buyerBoth tests, baseline, scoped recommendationsOn delivery
Technical sprintBlocked or blind siteAccess, rendering spec, verificationMachines can read the site
Full retainerQuestion-led category with real debtAll eight artefacts plus monthly measurementReviewed at month six
Baseline and monitorClean site, brand-led demandPrompt set recorded and re-run monthlyCompetitors start appearing and you do not

Video: AI search, crawlers and measurement

Background viewing. Every deliverable on this page is written out above; these are context rather than the source of anything here.

AI, AEO and what is changing

Frequently asked questions

What are AEO services?
Work that makes your pages retrievable, parseable and quotable by AI answer engines. In practice: crawler access proven from server logs, rendering without JavaScript, passage restructuring, schema reconciliation, entity consistency, third-party corroboration and prompt-set measurement.
What deliverables do I actually receive?
Eight artefacts in the first six weeks: a crawler access report, a robots audit, a render report per template, a dated prompt baseline, passage rewrites, an entity sheet, a schema diff, then monthly measurement against the baseline.
How are AEO services different from SEO services?
The unit of work changes from the page and keyword to the passage and template, and the evidence changes from rank reports to server logs, scriptless fetches and stored verbatim answers.
How much do AEO services cost?
Published US retainers run roughly $1,500-$20,000 per month and a one-off audit $1,000-$4,000. Your figure depends mainly on template count and rendering health.
What is not included?
High-volume article production, keyword research, rank tracking as a success measure, and any guarantee of citation. The blurred line is rendering implementation, which usually belongs with your engineers.
Do you implement the rendering fix yourselves?
We specify it and test it. Actually changing how your application renders is normally an engineering job for your developers, and saying otherwise is how AEO quotes end up wrong by an order of magnitude.
How do I verify the work was done?
Every artefact is independently checkable. Re-run the log query, curl a page with scripts disabled and count the words, ask the baseline prompts yourself, visit the corroboration sources listed.
Why do you store verbatim answers?
Because answers vary between runs. Without stored text there is no way to tell a genuine change from ordinary variance, and a citation count alone cannot be audited by anyone.
How long before I see anything?
Crawler access shows in logs within days. Rendering and structure take weeks. Citation frequency reads honestly from about month six.
Can you guarantee I will be cited by ChatGPT?
No. Nobody controls model output, and any supplier offering that guarantee is describing something that does not exist.
Is there a minimum term?
Six months, because that is the shortest period over which citation frequency says anything reliable. Shorter engagements are audits, not programmes.
Do AEO services include content writing?
Restructuring existing pages, yes. Publishing large volumes of new articles, no — volume is not the lever in this channel.
Which crawlers do you test for?
GPTBot and OAI-SearchBot from OpenAI, ClaudeBot from Anthropic, PerplexityBot, and Google-Extended, which governs Gemini and AI training use.
What if my site is a single-page application?
Then rendering is your dominant variable and we test it before quoting. It may need server-side rendering or prerendering, which is an engineering project rather than an agency line item.
Can I buy just the audit?
Yes, and for many buyers it is the right purchase. It converts assumptions into a scope and sometimes concludes you do not need the rest.
Do you do link building as part of this?
Third-party corroboration, yes — but for agreement rather than link equity. Independent sources repeating what you say is what makes a claim safe to quote.
How is success measured?
Citation frequency, share of voice against competitors, sentiment, prompt coverage, crawler hits and render coverage — all reported separately from search rankings.
Why report AEO separately from rankings?
Because merging them is how weak AEO work hides behind ordinary search gains. If both sit on one chart, one of them is decoration.
Which businesses get the most from AEO services?
B2B SaaS, professional services, healthcare, fintech and manufacturing. Local trades and walk-in retail currently get more from listings and reviews.
What happens in month one?
The crawler access report, the robots audit and the prompt baseline. For a surprising number of sites, month one contains most of the year’s result.
Is llms.txt part of the service?
We will add it, but we will not present it as a strategy. Adoption is low and it is not a ranking factor.
What if the audit says I do not need this?
Then we say so. It happens regularly, most often with clean server-rendered sites in brand-led categories.

Sources and further reading

  1. Google Search Essentials — SEO starter guide
  2. Google: creating helpful, reliable, people-first content
  3. Google: intro to structured data
  4. Google: LocalBusiness structured data
  5. Google: FAQPage structured data
  6. Google: Article structured data
  7. Google: Product structured data
  8. Google: title links in search results
  9. Google: control your snippets
  10. Google: robots.txt introduction
  11. Google: sitemaps overview
  12. Google: consolidate duplicate URLs
  13. Google: redirects and Search
  14. Google: JavaScript SEO basics
  15. Google: multi-regional and multilingual sites
  16. Google Search Central Blog
  17. Google: get started with Search Console
  18. Google: how local search results are determined
  19. Google Business Profile: prohibited and restricted content
  20. Google Business Profile: address and service area guidelines
  21. Google Business Profile: review policy
  22. Google Business Profile: add or edit categories
  23. Google Ads: location targeting settings
  24. Google Ads: about negative keywords
  25. Google Ads: about Quality Score
  26. Google Ads: importing offline conversions
  27. Google Ads: about Smart Bidding
  28. Google Ads: about Performance Max
  29. Google Local Services Ads: eligibility and screening
  30. Google Ads: keyword match types
  31. Google Analytics 4: about conversions
  32. Google Analytics 4: attribution models
  33. US Census Bureau QuickFacts: New Jersey
  34. US Census Bureau: American Community Survey
  35. US Census: Statistics of US Businesses
  36. Bureau of Labor Statistics: New Jersey data
  37. BLS: Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics
  38. NJ Department of Labor: labor market information
  39. New Jersey Business Action Center
  40. US Small Business Administration: New Jersey district
  41. USA.gov: business resources
  42. web.dev: Core Web Vitals explained
  43. web.dev: Largest Contentful Paint
  44. web.dev: Cumulative Layout Shift
  45. web.dev: Interaction to Next Paint
  46. Google PageSpeed Insights
  47. Google Rich Results Test
  48. Google Search Console
  49. W3C Markup Validation Service
  50. Schema.org: LocalBusiness type
  51. Schema.org: Service type
  52. Schema.org: FAQPage type
  53. Schema.org: HowTo type
  54. W3C: WCAG 2.2 quick reference
  55. FTC: CAN-SPAM Act compliance guide
  56. FCC: telemarketing and robocall rules (TCPA)
  57. FTC endorsement guides — reviews and testimonials
  58. FTC: rule on consumer reviews and testimonials
  59. HHS: HIPAA guidance on online tracking technologies
  60. New Jersey Courts: attorney advertising guidelines
  61. New Jersey DCA: construction codes and permits
  62. New Jersey Home Improvement Contractor registration
  63. New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs
  64. TikTok for Business
  65. TikTok Creative Center
  66. TikTok Ads Help Center
  67. TikTok Community Guidelines
  68. TikTok Terms of Service
  69. TikTok Privacy Policy
  70. TikTok Safety Center
  71. TikTok Transparency Center
  72. TikTok Creator Portal
  73. TikTok Newsroom
  74. TikTok for Developers
  75. TikTok advertising solutions
  76. TikTok Creator Marketplace
  77. TikTok Business Center
  78. TikTok for Business blog
  79. TikTok Creative Center: top ads
  80. TikTok Branded Content policy
  81. TikTok Shop for sellers
  82. Instagram for Business
  83. Instagram for Creators
  84. Instagram Help Center
  85. About Instagram
  86. Meta Business Suite
  87. Meta Business Help Center
  88. Meta Transparency Center
  89. About Meta
  90. Meta: Instagram platform docs
  91. YouTube Creators
  92. YouTube Official Blog
  93. YouTube Shorts help
  94. How YouTube Works
  95. YouTube Studio
  96. LinkedIn Marketing Solutions
  97. LinkedIn Help
  98. Pinterest Business
  99. Pinterest Business Help
  100. Snapchat for Business
  101. X for Business
  102. Reddit communities
  103. Reddit for Business Help
  104. ASCAP
  105. BMI
  106. SESAC
  107. Global Music Rights
  108. PRS for Music (UK)
  109. PPL (UK)
  110. SOCAN (Canada)
  111. APRA AMCOS (Australia)
  112. GEMA (Germany)
  113. SACEM (France)
  114. SIAE (Italy)
  115. JASRAC (Japan)
  116. IFPI
  117. RIAA
  118. National Music Publishers Association
  119. Harry Fox Agency
  120. SoundExchange
  121. Music Reports
  122. Epidemic Sound
  123. Artlist
  124. Soundstripe
  125. PremiumBeat
  126. AudioJungle
  127. Free Music Archive
  128. Creative Commons
  129. Incompetech
  130. FTC: advertising and marketing
  131. FTC: disclosures 101
  132. FTC: endorsement guides
  133. FTC: consumer reviews rule
  134. FTC: advertising FAQs
  135. US Copyright Office
  136. US Copyright Office: DMCA
  137. US Copyright Office: music FAQ
  138. US Copyright Office: fair use FAQ
  139. USPTO: trademarks
  140. UK Advertising Standards Authority
  141. ACCC (Australia)
  142. Competition Bureau Canada
  143. GDPR overview
  144. California Consumer Privacy Act
  145. COPPA
  146. FTC: children’s privacy
  147. W3C Web Accessibility Initiative
  148. W3C: WCAG
  149. W3C: captions
  150. W3C: making audio and video accessible
  151. ADA.gov
  152. WebAIM
  153. Epilepsy Foundation
  154. Pew Research: internet and technology
  155. DataReportal
  156. US Census Bureau
  157. US Bureau of Labor Statistics
  158. Interactive Advertising Bureau
  159. Think with Google
  160. Google Trends
  161. Nielsen insights
  162. Schema.org: VideoObject
  163. Schema.org: SocialMediaPosting
  164. Schema.org: MusicRecording
  165. Schema.org: HowTo
  166. Schema.org: FAQPage
  167. Schema.org: Organization
  168. Google: video best practices
  169. Google: video structured data
  170. CapCut
  171. Adobe Premiere Rush
  172. DaVinci Resolve
  173. Canva
  174. Descript
  175. VEED
  176. Kapwing
  177. Otter.ai
  178. Later
  179. Buffer
  180. Hootsuite
  181. Sprout Social
  182. Google Analytics
  183. Google Search Console
  184. Google Analytics developer docs
  185. GA4: events and conversions
  186. Matomo
  187. Plausible Analytics
  188. Similarweb
  189. UK Information Commissioner’s Office
  190. Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
  191. Australian OAIC
  192. European Data Protection Board
  193. EU data protection
  194. EU Digital Services Act
  195. Ofcom
  196. FCC
  197. AIGA
  198. Nielsen Norman Group
  199. Smashing Magazine
  200. web.dev
  201. MDN: web media
  202. MDN: the video element
  203. ISO 21001 (reference)
  204. Buma/Stemra (Netherlands)
  205. STIM (Sweden)
  206. Teosto (Finland)
  207. Koda (Denmark)
  208. TONO (Norway)
  209. IMRO (Ireland)
  210. SGAE (Spain)
  211. ZAiKS (Poland)
  212. KOMCA (South Korea)
  213. MCSC (China)
  214. CISAC
  215. World Intellectual Property Organization
  216. TikTok: creating videos
  217. TikTok: exploring videos
  218. TikTok: privacy settings
  219. TikTok: growing your audience
  220. TikTok Creator Academy
  221. TikTok Effect House
  222. TikTok for small business
  223. Instagram: Reels help
  224. YouTube: Shorts best practice
  225. How YouTube recommends
  226. Pinterest Predicts
  227. Snapchat for Business
  228. Hootsuite blog
  229. Social Media Examiner
  230. Marketing Week
  231. Adweek
  232. Google Search Essentials — SEO starter guide
  233. Google: creating helpful, reliable, people-first content
  234. Google: intro to structured data
  235. Google: LocalBusiness structured data
  236. Google: FAQPage structured data
  237. Google: Article structured data
  238. Google: Product structured data
  239. Google: title links in search results
  240. Google: control your snippets
  241. Google: robots.txt introduction
  242. Google: sitemaps overview
  243. Google: consolidate duplicate URLs
  244. Google: redirects and Search
  245. Google: JavaScript SEO basics
  246. Google: multi-regional and multilingual sites
  247. Google Search Central Blog
  248. Google: get started with Search Console
  249. Google: how local search results are determined
  250. Google Business Profile: prohibited and restricted content
  251. Google Business Profile: address and service area guidelines
  252. Google Business Profile: review policy
  253. Google Business Profile: add or edit categories
  254. web.dev: Core Web Vitals explained
  255. web.dev: Largest Contentful Paint
  256. web.dev: Cumulative Layout Shift
  257. web.dev: Interaction to Next Paint
  258. Google PageSpeed Insights
  259. Google Rich Results Test
  260. Google Search Console
  261. W3C Markup Validation Service
  262. Schema.org: LocalBusiness type
  263. Schema.org: Service type
  264. Schema.org: FAQPage type
  265. Schema.org: HowTo type
  266. W3C: WCAG 2.2 quick reference
  267. US Census Bureau QuickFacts: New Jersey
  268. US Census Bureau: American Community Survey
  269. US Census: Statistics of US Businesses
  270. Bureau of Labor Statistics: New Jersey data
  271. BLS: Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics
  272. NJ Department of Labor: labor market information
  273. New Jersey Business Action Center
  274. US Small Business Administration: New Jersey district
  275. USA.gov: business resources
  276. OpenAI — GPTBot and OAI-SearchBot documentation
  277. Google — crawlers and user agents
  278. Conductor — AI referral traffic share

Want this done for your site?We build and maintain the search, content and paid programmes described on this page.

Get a free proposal

Get a free marketing proposal

Tell us what you are trying to grow and we will come back with a plan, not a pitch deck. Same-day reply on weekdays.

Privacy Preferences
When you visit our website, it may store information through your browser from specific services, usually in form of cookies. Here you can change your privacy preferences. Please note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our website and the services we offer.
Contact Us