Updated September 2026 · Written and maintained by the Progression Agency strategy team
Retail consulting is not one service. It is eight distinct disciplines — strategy, merchandising, pricing, store operations, supply chain, store design, ecommerce and technology — sold under one word, and buying the wrong one is the most expensive mistake in the category. This page sets out what each covers, which situations justify hiring at all, what engagements should deliver, and the questions that separate a firm describing your problem from a firm selling a program.
The short answerThree decisions settle this before you contact anybody. First, name the discipline: a firm strong in merchandising may know nothing useful about supply chain, and ‘retail consulting’ without a named discipline is an undefined purchase. Second, choose the engagement type — diagnosis, strategy, implementation, or fractional leadership — because buying strategy when you needed implementation produces a document. Third, record your baseline yourself, before anybody starts, because retrospective measurement in retail is genuinely contested and the review becomes an argument without it.
This page describes how retail consulting is bought and structured. It does not rank or evaluate named consulting firms: engagement outcomes are private, cannot be verified from outside, and any list claiming otherwise is reporting firms’ own marketing. Cost and timeline figures are stated as ranges typical of the category rather than as quotes. Progression Agency is a marketing firm and does not provide retail operations, inventory or supply chain consulting.
Progression Agency runs Marketing Strategy, Performance Marketing and Ecommerce Websites as separate divisions. We are a marketing firm rather than a retail operations consultancy, which is why this page is written to help you scope and buy the right kind of help — including the cases where that help is not us. We are a New York City firm working across the United States.
What does retail consulting actually cover?
Eight distinct disciplines that are frequently sold under one word. A firm strong in merchandising may know nothing useful about supply chain, and buying ‘retail consulting’ without naming the discipline is how engagements end up answering a question nobody asked.
Retail strategy
Answer first: what you sell, to whom, through which channels, and what you deliberately will not do. Strategy work produces decisions rather than analysis, and an engagement that ends without a decision has produced a document.
Merchandising and assortment
Answer first: which products to carry, in what depth, at what price tier, in which locations. This is where most retail margin is won or lost, and it is measurable within a season rather than over years.
Pricing and promotion
Answer first: what to charge, when to discount, and how deeply. Pricing consulting earns its fee fastest of any discipline here because the changes are reversible and the effect appears in weeks.
Store operations
Answer first: labor scheduling, task allocation, shrink, and the process a store follows. It is unglamorous, it is where a substantial share of controllable cost sits, and it is under-bought.
Supply chain and inventory
Answer first: what you order, when, and how it moves. Inventory consulting frequently pays for itself in working capital released rather than in revenue added, which is a different business case and an easier one.
Store design and experience
Answer first: layout, fixtures, flow and what a customer physically does in the space. Expensive to implement, slow to measure, and genuinely valuable when the format itself is the problem.
Ecommerce and omnichannel
Answer first: how online and physical retail relate, from fulfillment to returns to inventory visibility. This is the discipline most often bought from a digital agency when it is actually an operations problem.
Retail technology
Answer first: point of sale, inventory systems, and how they connect. Technology consulting is frequently sold as strategy and should be bought as implementation, with a named outcome rather than a roadmap.
What situations actually justify hiring a retail consultant?
Ten, and they share a shape: a decision that is expensive to get wrong, a skill you do not have in-house, and a deadline. Absent all three, the honest answer is usually to do the work yourself and spend the money on inventory.
Sales falling with no identified cause
Answer first: this is a diagnosis engagement and it should be short. If a firm proposes six months to tell you why sales fell, they are selling a program rather than an answer.
Opening a second or third location
Answer first: the systems that worked for one store frequently break at three, and the failure is operational rather than commercial. This is a genuine and common trigger.
Margin falling while revenue holds
Answer first: almost always a mix, pricing or shrink problem, and all three are diagnosable from data you already hold. A consultant should confirm which within weeks.
A format that has stopped working
Answer first: when the store itself is the constraint rather than what is in it. Expensive to address and worth external eyes, because the people inside a format struggle to see it.
Entering ecommerce properly for the first time
Answer first: the hard part is fulfillment, returns and inventory visibility rather than the website. Buying a website when the problem is operations is the most common misdiagnosis here.
Inventory tying up too much cash
Answer first: a working-capital problem with a clear payback, which makes it one of the easiest engagements to justify and to measure.
Preparing for a sale or investment
Answer first: the buyer will examine unit economics, inventory quality and lease commitments. Fixing what they will find is worth more than presenting it well.
A category consistently underperforming
Answer first: assortment, pricing or placement, and the data usually says which. A narrow engagement beats a full review when the problem is already localized.
Post-acquisition integration
Answer first: two systems, two assortments, two cultures. Genuinely hard, genuinely worth external help, and the discipline needed is operations rather than strategy.
Leadership without retail experience
Answer first: a new owner or investor group lacking category knowledge. Advisory rather than project work, and frequently better served by a fractional operator than a consulting firm.
What engagement types exist, and which fits?
Six, and the choice matters more than the firm. Buying a strategy engagement when you needed implementation produces a document; buying implementation when you needed diagnosis produces confident action in the wrong direction.
Diagnostic assessment
Answer first: two to six weeks establishing what is actually wrong. The cheapest way to buy certainty before committing to anything larger, and the step most often skipped.
Strategy engagement
Answer first: a set of decisions about direction, usually eight to twelve weeks. Judge it on whether decisions were made, not on the quality of the deck.
Implementation support
Answer first: consultants working alongside your team to make a change happen. More expensive per week and the only type that reliably changes anything.
Interim or fractional leadership
Answer first: an experienced operator inside the business part-time. Frequently better value than a consulting firm for a business without senior retail experience.
Retained advisory
Answer first: ongoing access to judgment without a project. Suits owner-operators who need someone to think with rather than a deliverable.
Specialist project
Answer first: one defined problem — a pricing architecture, a supply chain redesign, a store format test. Narrow scope, clear endpoint, easiest to evaluate.
How do retail consulting firms differ from each other?
By size, by discipline depth, and by whether they implement. Those three distinctions predict the experience far better than reputation does.
Large global firms
Answer first: deep resources, senior partners who sell and junior teams who deliver, and pricing that suits enterprise budgets. Ask who is actually on the engagement.
Mid-sized specialist firms
Answer first: genuine depth in one or two disciplines and less breadth. Frequently the best value when you already know which discipline you need.
Boutique and independent consultants
Answer first: one experienced operator, direct access, no leverage model. Excellent for advisory and diagnosis, limited capacity for implementation at scale.
Former operators turned consultants
Answer first: people who ran the function they now advise on. Strong practical judgment, sometimes weaker analytical rigour, and worth asking about both.
Technology-led consultancies
Answer first: firms whose recommendation tends toward a system implementation. Legitimate when systems are the problem and a real bias to check for.
Agencies offering retail consulting
Answer first: usually marketing capability described as consulting. Fine if marketing is your constraint; a mismatch if the problem is operations or assortment.
How does the advice change by retail segment?
Substantially. The disciplines are the same and their relative weight is completely different, which is why a consultant whose experience is all in one segment may transfer poorly to another.
Grocery and food retail
Answer first: margin is thin, velocity is everything, and shrink and waste dominate the controllable cost picture. Assortment decisions play out in days rather than seasons.
Fashion and apparel
Answer first: markdown management and sell-through timing drive profitability more than initial margin does. Buying decisions made months ahead make forecasting the central discipline.
Home and furniture
Answer first: low frequency, high consideration, and a delivery operation attached to every sale. The logistics tail is frequently underestimated.
Health, beauty and pharmacy
Answer first: regulated in parts, high repeat rate, and unusually well suited to subscription and replenishment mechanics that most operators under-use.
Specialty and hobby retail
Answer first: deep assortment and expert staff are the proposition, which makes labor cost a strategic decision rather than a line to minimize.
Convenience and forecourt
Answer first: footfall is largely determined by location and fuel pricing, so the controllable levers are range, speed and shrink.
Luxury retail
Answer first: experience and scarcity carry the proposition, discounting damages it, and the usual promotional playbook is actively harmful.
Discount and value retail
Answer first: operating cost discipline is the entire model. Every recommendation must survive a cost-to-serve test that would be secondary elsewhere.
Pure-play ecommerce
Answer first: customer acquisition cost and repeat rate decide viability, and inventory decisions are made further from the customer than in physical retail.
Franchise and multi-site operators
Answer first: consistency across sites is the problem, and the fix is process and reporting rather than strategy. Advice that cannot be executed by a franchisee is not advice.
What does retail consulting cost, and how is it priced?
Six pricing models, and the model shapes the incentives more than the rate does. Understanding which one you are buying tells you what the firm is optimizing for.
Fixed fee per project
Answer first: a defined scope for a defined price. Best when the problem is well specified, and it makes scope changes a negotiation rather than a surprise.
Time and materials
Answer first: you pay for hours worked. Flexible, and it puts the burden of controlling scope entirely on you.
Monthly retainer
Answer first: ongoing access for a fixed monthly fee. Suits advisory relationships and drifts toward paying for availability rather than output if nobody defines deliverables.
Day rate for an individual
Answer first: the most transparent model and the most common with independents. Easy to compare and easy to scope in days rather than outcomes.
Performance-linked fees
Answer first: part of the fee depends on a measured outcome. Attractive in principle and difficult in practice, because attribution in retail is genuinely contested.
Equity or profit share
Answer first: rare, and appropriate only where the consultant is effectively joining the business. Treat any proposal of this kind as a partnership decision rather than a purchase.
What should a retail consulting engagement actually deliver?
Named outputs a person could point at, not a report. Eight deliverables that constitute real value, each of which can be specified in a contract before work begins.
A written diagnosis with the evidence
Answer first: what is wrong, how it was established, and what data supports it. Without the evidence you cannot check the conclusion or defend it internally.
A prioritized list of changes
Answer first: ordered by return and by feasibility, not by ambition. A list that does not acknowledge your constraints has not been written for you.
The numbers behind each recommendation
Answer first: what each change is expected to produce and on what assumption. Recommendations without arithmetic cannot be evaluated or defended.
A decision your team can implement
Answer first: written so that somebody in your business can act without the consultant present. Advice requiring the author to interpret it is incomplete.
A measurement plan agreed in advance
Answer first: what will be tracked, from what baseline, over what period. Agreed before work starts, or the assessment becomes an argument.
Knowledge transferred to your team
Answer first: your people should be able to repeat the analysis next year. A firm that resists this is protecting a renewal rather than serving you.
The things they recommend not doing
Answer first: an explicit list of options considered and rejected, with reasons. It is the clearest evidence that real analysis happened.
A stated view on what could go wrong
Answer first: the risks in their own recommendation. A consultant unwilling to name them has either not thought about it or is not telling you.
What are the warning signs when choosing a firm?
Eight, and most are visible in the first conversation. None requires inside knowledge to spot.
A proposal written before any diagnosis
Answer first: a scoped program arriving before anybody examined your numbers is a product being sold rather than a response to your situation.
A methodology presented as the answer
Answer first: a named framework is a way of working, not a finding. Ask what it concluded about businesses like yours.
No named individuals on the engagement
Answer first: the people who pitch are frequently not the people who deliver. Ask who specifically will be in your business, and how often.
Unwillingness to state what they would not do
Answer first: a firm with no refusals has either not encountered the limits of its advice or is not describing them.
Case studies with no numbers
Answer first: outcomes described without arithmetic are narratives. Ask what the baseline was and how the result was measured.
Recommendations that require their implementation
Answer first: a diagnosis whose only remedy is a larger engagement with the same firm deserves a second opinion.
A fixed answer arriving too fast
Answer first: confident conclusions in the first meeting reflect pattern-matching rather than your data. Sometimes the pattern is right and it should still be checked.
Resistance to a short diagnostic first
Answer first: a firm confident in its value should welcome a small paid diagnosis. Insistence on committing to the full program up front is a commercial preference, not a methodological one.
What should you ask before signing anything?
Eight questions, and the last two separate most reliably because they ask the firm to describe its own limits.
Which discipline is this engagement actually in?
Answer first: strategy, merchandising, operations, supply chain, pricing, design, ecommerce or technology. If the answer is ‘all of them’, the scope has not been defined.
Who specifically will do the work?
Answer first: named people, their experience, and how much of their time you get. Seniority in the pitch tells you nothing about seniority in delivery.
What will exist at the end that does not exist now?
Answer first: a list of artefacts and decisions. If the honest answer is a report, price it as a report.
How will we know whether it worked?
Answer first: agreed metrics, an agreed baseline and an agreed review date, all written down before the engagement starts.
What are you assuming that might be wrong?
Answer first: every recommendation rests on assumptions, and a firm that can state theirs is thinking rather than presenting.
What could go wrong with this recommendation?
Answer first: the risks in their own advice. Reluctance here is the single most informative reaction in the whole process.
What would you tell us not to spend money on?
Answer first: a firm willing to shrink its own scope is describing your interests rather than theirs.
When would you tell us to stop?
Answer first: the conditions under which they would recommend ending the engagement. Very few firms have an answer and the ones that do are worth more.
How should the engagement be measured?
Six measures, chosen before work begins and calculated from a baseline you recorded yourself. Retrospective measurement in retail is contested for good reasons.
Gross margin by category
Answer first: the cleanest measure of whether merchandising and pricing advice worked, and it moves within a season.
Inventory turns and weeks of cover
Answer first: the measure for any supply chain or assortment engagement, and one where improvement releases cash rather than adding revenue.
Sales per square foot or per labor hour
Answer first: the productivity measure for operations and store design work. Compare against your own history rather than an industry figure.
Shrink as a percentage of sales
Answer first: the measure for operations engagements, and a number many operators track imprecisely until somebody looks.
Sell-through and markdown rate
Answer first: the fashion and seasonal measure, and the one where forecasting improvements show first.
Cash released from working capital
Answer first: frequently the largest and least-claimed benefit of inventory work, and the easiest to verify from your own accounts.
What are the alternatives to hiring a consultant?
Six, and several are cheaper and faster for the problems most retailers actually have. A consultant is one option rather than the default.
Doing the analysis yourself
Answer first: most retail diagnosis uses data you already hold. A fortnight of disciplined work on your own numbers frequently finds what an engagement would.
Hiring the capability permanently
Answer first: if the need is ongoing, an employee costs less than a consultant over any horizon beyond a few months and accumulates knowledge you keep.
A fractional or interim operator
Answer first: experienced retail leadership part-time, usually cheaper than a firm and more practical than advice.
Industry peer networks
Answer first: other operators facing the same problems, at no fee. Underused, and particularly useful for operational questions.
Supplier and vendor expertise
Answer first: your suppliers see many retailers and frequently know what works in your category. Their advice is free and interested, which is worth weighing rather than dismissing.
A narrow specialist for one question
Answer first: buying two days of pricing expertise beats buying twelve weeks of general consulting when the question is about pricing.
Why do retail consulting engagements fail?
Eight reasons, and only two are about the consultant. The rest are about how the engagement was bought and what happened after it ended.
Nobody was accountable for implementing it
Answer first: the most common failure by a wide margin. A recommendation with no named owner and no time allocated does not happen.
The scope answered the wrong question
Answer first: a merchandising engagement bought when the problem was operations. Diagnosis first prevents this and is routinely skipped.
No baseline was recorded
Answer first: without a starting figure, the review becomes an argument about whether anything changed.
The recommendations exceeded the capacity to execute
Answer first: forty recommendations delivered to a team that can implement three produces three at best and frequently none.
The team was not involved in the work
Answer first: conclusions handed down are resisted; conclusions the team helped reach are implemented. This is about how the work is run, not about persuasion afterwards.
The engagement ended at the report
Answer first: the value is in the change, and the report is the midpoint. Budgeting for the report and not the implementation guarantees the outcome.
The consultant lacked segment experience
Answer first: retail disciplines transfer between segments imperfectly. A grocery specialist advising a luxury retailer needs to earn that transfer explicitly.
Conditions changed and nobody revisited it
Answer first: a recommendation written against last year’s conditions may be wrong now. A stated review point prevents advice outliving its assumptions.
How do you get the most from an engagement you have already bought?
Six things, all within your control and none requiring the consultant’s cooperation.
Name one internal owner before day one
Answer first: somebody whose job includes making this happen, with time allocated. Without it, everything else on this list is decoration.
Give them the real numbers immediately
Answer first: withheld or sanitized data produces recommendations built on a picture that is not yours. It also wastes the first three weeks.
Put your team in the room
Answer first: the people who will implement should be part of reaching the conclusion. It costs their time and it is what converts a report into a change.
Ask for the working, not just the answer
Answer first: the analysis is more valuable than the conclusion, because you can rerun it next year and they cannot stop you.
Insist on a shortlist, not a long one
Answer first: ask what the three highest-return changes are. A long list is a way of avoiding a judgment.
Book the review before the work starts
Answer first: a date in the calendar, with the agreed metrics, six months out. It is the single cheapest thing that makes an engagement accountable.
Where does marketing sit in all of this?
Adjacent, and frequently confused with it. Marketing decides how many people come and what they believe; retail consulting decides what happens to the economics once they do.
When the problem is genuinely marketing
Answer first: footfall or traffic is falling while conversion, basket and margin hold. That is a demand problem and a marketing engagement is the right purchase.
When it looks like marketing and is not
Answer first: traffic holding while conversion or margin falls. Spending on acquisition here raises the cost of a problem rather than solving it.
Where the two genuinely overlap
Answer first: assortment and positioning are the same decision viewed from two ends, and pricing sits in both. These are the places to insist the two conversations happen together.
What a marketing firm should decline
Answer first: inventory, shrink, labor scheduling and supply chain. We do not do those, and a marketing agency accepting that brief is selling capability it does not have.
What a retail consultancy should decline
Answer first: search visibility, paid acquisition mechanics and conversion optimization. Naming the boundary in both directions is what makes either recommendation trustworthy.
Retail consulting firms compared on what each type actually offers
The table assesses firm types rather than named companies, because the useful distinction is structural. Which type suits you is decided by which discipline you need and whether you need somebody to implement.
| Firm type | Best for | Weakness | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Large global firm | Multi-site, complex, board-level | Junior delivery teams, high cost | Who is actually on the engagement |
| Mid-sized specialist | One discipline, done deeply | Limited breadth | Whether your problem is in their discipline |
| Boutique or independent | Diagnosis and advisory | No implementation capacity | Capacity, and what happens after the advice |
| Former operator | Practical judgment | Sometimes light on analysis | Whether they can show the working |
| Technology-led | System selection and rollout | Bias toward a system answer | Whether they ever recommend no system |
| Fractional leadership | Ongoing capability gap | Not a project team | Availability and length of commitment |
| Marketing agency | Demand and positioning | Not operations or inventory | Whether they decline the operations brief |
The final row is the one we can speak to directly. A marketing agency accepting a brief about inventory, shrink or labor scheduling is selling capability it does not have, and the check is simply whether the firm declines the parts outside its discipline.
| Your situation | Engagement type | Typical length | What success looks like |
|---|---|---|---|
| Something is wrong, cause unknown | Diagnostic assessment | 2-6 weeks | A written cause with evidence |
| Direction unclear | Strategy engagement | 8-12 weeks | Decisions made, not options listed |
| Know what to do, cannot do it | Implementation support | 3-9 months | The change is live |
| No senior retail experience | Fractional or interim | Ongoing | Capability inside the business |
| One defined problem | Specialist project | 2-8 weeks | That problem resolved |
| Need judgment occasionally | Retained advisory | Ongoing | Better decisions, no deliverable |
| Preparing for sale | Diagnostic plus remediation | 3-6 months | Issues fixed, not presented |
Read the first column and stop there. The most expensive error in this category is buying the wrong row, and it is settled before any firm is contacted.
The demand chart is small and specific, which is what a practitioner keyword set looks like. The people searching these terms are retailers with a problem rather than students, which makes the volume a poor guide to the value of answering them properly.
The failure chart plots the eight reasons engagements fail by how often each occurs against how preventable it is. Six of the eight sit in the preventable half and are decided by the buyer rather than the firm, which is an encouraging finding if you are the buyer.
Retail strategy consulting specifically, and how it differs from the rest
Answer first: retail strategy consulting decides what you sell, to whom, through which channels, and what you will deliberately not do. It is the highest-level of the eight disciplines, the slowest to show measurable effect, and the one most often bought when a narrower discipline would have answered the question.
When retail strategy consulting is the right purchase
When the question is genuinely about direction rather than execution: entering a new channel, changing format, repositioning against a new competitor, or deciding what to stop doing. Those are strategy questions and nothing narrower will answer them.
When it is the wrong purchase
When the numbers already point at a specific discipline. Falling margin with steady revenue is a pricing, mix or shrink question, and buying strategy to answer it produces a broad review that arrives at the narrow finding you could have started with.
Why strategy engagements are hardest to evaluate
Because the effect appears over years and is confounded by everything else that happened. That is why the deliverable matters so much: decisions made and options explicitly rejected are checkable in a way that outcomes are not.
| Discipline | Speed of payback | How it is measured | Capital required |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing and promotion | Weeks | Gross margin by category | None |
| Merchandising and assortment | One season | Sell-through, markdown rate | Inventory only |
| Store operations | One to two quarters | Sales per labor hour, shrink | Little |
| Supply chain and inventory | One to two quarters | Inventory turns, cash released | None; it releases cash |
| Ecommerce and omnichannel | Two to four quarters | Conversion, fulfillment cost | Moderate |
| Retail technology | Two to four quarters | Depends on the system | High |
| Store design and experience | A year or more | Sales per square foot | High |
| Retail strategy consulting | Years | Contested; judge on decisions made | Varies |
Read the first and last rows together. Pricing pays back in weeks with no capital and is bought least often; strategy pays back over years, is hardest to measure, and is bought most often. That inversion is worth noticing before choosing a scope.
| When | What to record | Why it matters later |
|---|---|---|
| Before | Gross margin by category, twelve months | Everything is measured against this |
| Before | Inventory turns and weeks of cover | The supply chain baseline |
| Before | Sales per labor hour by site | The operations baseline |
| Before | Shrink as a percentage of sales | Frequently tracked imprecisely until someone looks |
| During | What was recommended and what was rejected | Distinguishes analysis from assertion |
| During | What your team actually implemented | Separates advice failure from execution failure |
| After | The same six measures, same method | The comparison only works if the method matches |
The sixth row is the one that makes the review honest. An engagement whose recommendations were never implemented has not been tested, and recording what was actually done separates a firm that was wrong from a business that did not act.
Not sure whether your problem is marketing or operations?
Tell us what has changed in your numbers — traffic, conversion, basket, margin — and we will tell you which of the two it is. If it is operations, inventory or assortment we will say so and point you at the right kind of firm rather than taking the brief.
Revenue operations, and healthcare supply chain
Two consulting categories bought by very different parts of a business.
A revenue operations consultant aligns the systems, data and processes across marketing, sales and customer success so that the pipeline is measured once rather than three times. Revenue operations consultants are usually engaged because the numbers disagree: marketing reports leads, sales reports opportunities, finance reports revenue, and nobody can reconcile them. A revenue operations agency does the same work as a standing service, which suits companies without the internal headcount to own the systems.
The work is unglamorous and high-return: a single definition of a qualified lead, one source of truth for the pipeline, handoff rules that are enforced by the system rather than by goodwill, and reporting that the executive team actually trusts. Most of the value arrives before any new software is bought.
Healthcare supply chain consultants work on an entirely different problem: sourcing, inventory, distribution and cost for providers and manufacturers, where a stockout is a clinical event rather than a commercial one. The constraints that shape it are regulatory traceability, cold chain, single-source risk and the fact that the people specifying a product are clinicians rather than buyers.
Getting found in search
AI, AEO and what is changing
Paid media and lead generation
Websites and design
- Hire PHP developers
- Bankruptcy lawyer website design
- Web design in North Carolina
- Web design in Seattle
- Ecommerce web development
- Ecommerce development services
- Squarespace customization
- Consulting websites
- Beauty stores on Shopify
- Content commerce
- 404 and bad request errors
- FTP clients
- Website design and development
- Design, development and management
- Creating a gallery
- Custom CSS
- Summary blocks
- Website maintenance services
- Web design agency, San Jose
- WordPress outsourcing
- StoryBrand website framework
- StoryBrand websites
- StoryBrand website design
- Squarespace logos
- Product configurators
- Web development services
- How much does a website cost?
- What to include on a homepage
- Website redesign services
- Website maintenance
- Shopify ecommerce agency
- Ecommerce website design
- BigCommerce vs Shopify
- Service business website design
- Healthcare website design
- Websites for restaurants
- Squarespace design services
- Squarespace vs WordPress
- Wix vs WordPress
- Web design in Queens
- Web design for small business
- Shopify agency
- Shopify checkout optimization
- Headless commerce and Hydrogen
- Shopify pricing guide
- Shopify checkout extensibility
- Squarespace pricing
- Publishing a Squarespace site
- What Squarespace is
- Learning Squarespace
- Squarespace dropdown menus
- Domain vs website
- Videography websites
- Ecommerce product configurators
- Negative space in design
- YouTube channels for web designers
- How to back up a Squarespace website
- Best dental websites
- Website dimensions and image sizes
- Web design in Charlotte NC
- Web design in Nashville
- Web design in Seattle
- Web design in Atlanta
- Product design agencies
- Digital product agencies
Choosing and working with an agency
Social, content and brand
By industry and by situation
Frequently asked questions
What is retail consulting?
Which retail consulting discipline do I actually need?
When is hiring a retail consultant justified?
What does retail consulting cost?
How long should an engagement last?
Should I buy a diagnosis before a full program?
What should a retail consulting engagement deliver?
Why do most retail consulting engagements fail?
How do I measure whether it worked?
What are the warning signs when choosing a firm?
What questions separate a good firm from a bad one?
Do I need a firm with experience in my retail segment?
What is the difference between strategy and implementation engagements?
Is a fractional operator better than a consulting firm?
What are the alternatives to hiring a consultant?
Which discipline pays back fastest?
How do I get more from an engagement I have already bought?
Should the consultant’s team or my team do the analysis?
Can a marketing agency do retail consulting?
How do I tell a marketing problem from a retail operations problem?
Why does this page not rank retail consulting firms?
What should I do before contacting any firm?
Get a free marketing proposal
Tell us what you are trying to grow and we will come back with a plan, not a pitch deck. Same-day reply on weekdays.