Supplement Marketing Agency: Supplement Advertising, Claims Compliance and Growth for Vitamin and Supplement Brands

Updated October 2026 · Written and maintained by the Progression Agency strategy team

A supplement marketing agency grows a vitamin or supplement brand inside the rules that decide what it may say: FDA’s structure/function framework, the FTC’s evidence standard for health claims, and the advertising policies of Meta, Google, TikTok and Amazon. This page is for supplement and vitamin brands, from a first product on Shopify to a catalog on Amazon and in stores. It covers the claims a supplement may make, the evidence behind supplement advertising, what each ad platform allows, supplement ads that work inside those limits, packaging, search, the website and what marketing costs. Clinics and wellness practices have their own page. Every engagement starts with a free proposal and a written scope.

What does a supplement marketing agency do?

A supplement marketing agency plans, buys and measures the marketing for brands that sell vitamins, minerals, botanicals, protein and other products sold as dietary supplements. The channel work is familiar: paid social, search, creators, email and a product page that converts. What sets supplement marketing apart is the order of operations. Wording is settled first, against the labeling rules and the evidence on file, and only then does anyone design an ad. A dietary supplement marketing agency spends as much time on what an ad leaves out as on what it says. Responsibility for the product’s labeling stays with the brand. FDA states on its dietary supplements page that under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA), manufacturers and distributors must evaluate the safety and labeling of their products before marketing them, and that FDA can act against an adulterated or misbranded supplement after it reaches the market. Supplement marketing sits on top of that duty, which is why an engagement begins with the brand’s claims and not with its creative.

Supplement and vitamin brands this page is for

The work fits brands at several stages, from a first product on a Shopify store to a catalog sold on Amazon and in stores. Typical products include:

• Daily multivitamins, single vitamins and minerals.
• Protein powders and sports nutrition.
• Botanical and herbal products.
• Gut, sleep, focus and energy products.
• Beauty-from-within lines. A brand that also sells cosmetics faces a second rulebook, covered on our beauty marketing agency page.

Claims first, creative second

Every ad, label, product page and creator brief is a set of claims. The sequence that keeps a brand out of trouble is the same each time: decide which statements the product can support, write them down beside the evidence for each, then build creative from that list. Skipping ahead produces ads that have to be pulled and ad accounts with a history of rejections. The agency holds the sequence; the brand and its counsel own the decision about what is true and permitted.

Practices, CPG and Amazon pages

Neighboring work has its own pages. Clinics, spas and practitioners are covered on our wellness marketing agency page. Packaged food, beverage and personal care brands, with supplements as one line among many, are on our CPG marketing agency page. Marketplace listings and Amazon advertising are on our Amazon marketing agency page. This page goes deeper on the supplement brand itself.

What a supplement label and ad may claim under DSHEA

Two texts set the outer limits of a supplement’s claims: the statute, 21 U.S.C. 343(r)(6), and the FDA rule that carries it out, 21 CFR 101.93. Both were re-read in October 2026 for this page. What follows paraphrases them in plain English and is not legal advice.

Structure/function claims and the 30-day notice

The statute allows four kinds of statement on a supplement: a benefit related to a classical nutrient deficiency disease, with the prevalence of that disease in the United States disclosed; the role of a nutrient or ingredient in affecting the structure or function of the body; the documented mechanism by which it maintains that structure or function; and general well-being from taking it. Each must be truthful, backed by substantiation the maker holds, and carry the disclaimer shown below. FDA does not pre-approve any of them. Its structure/function claims page gives “calcium builds strong bones” as its example.

The maker, packer or distributor must notify FDA no later than 30 days after first marketing the product with the statement. Under 101.93 the notice gives the firm’s name and address, the text of the statement and the product it relates to, and it is signed by a responsible individual who certifies that the information is complete and accurate and that the firm has substantiation that the statement is truthful and not misleading.

The disclaimer, word for word, and where it goes

The disclaimer reads: “This statement has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.” Where a label carries more than one statement, the rule allows a plural version that begins “These statements have not been evaluated” and is otherwise identical. Placement is spelled out in 101.93:

• It sits next to the statement with nothing in between, or it is tied to the statement by a symbol such as an asterisk placed at the end of the statement and again beside the disclaimer.
• It appears on each panel or page that carries a statement.
• It is set off in a box where it is not adjacent to the statement.
• It is in boldface type no smaller than one-sixteenth inch. The statute adds that it must be prominently displayed and in boldface.

A designer needs those rules before the pack is laid out, not after. The rule’s wording speaks of label and labeling. A brand that wants the same protection in its ads and on its product pages usually places the disclaimer beside the claim there as well, and counsel decides what each channel requires.

Disease claims, including implied ones

In 101.93 a disease is damage to an organ, part, structure or system of the body such that it does not function properly (the rule’s example is cardiovascular disease), or a state of health leading to that dysfunction (its example is hypertension). If a supplement’s labeling carries a disease claim, the product becomes subject to regulation as a drug unless the claim is an authorized health claim the product qualifies for. FDA’s page gives the reason in one line: only a drug can legally make such a claim.

A claim counts whether it is stated or implied. Among the rule’s criteria are a claimed effect on a specific disease, an effect on the characteristic signs or symptoms of a disease, and an effect on an abnormal condition that is uncommon or can cause significant or permanent harm. FDA says it considers the context in which the claim appears. The question the rule asks is what a statement claims about a disease, explicitly or implicitly, not which verb it uses.

Can names, images and citations make a claim too?

Yes. This is where careful teams get caught. 101.93 lists the routes by which a product can be found to make a disease claim without saying so: through the product’s name, through a statement about its formulation, through a cited publication that refers to a disease use when the citation implies treatment or prevention (the rule points to placement on the immediate label, inappropriate prominence or a lack of relationship to the express claims), through the word “disease” outside general statements about disease prevention, and through “pictures, vignettes, symbols, or other means.” For a designer that becomes three review questions. Does the name point at a condition? Does any image or icon suggest treating one? Does any quoted study or link do the same? The cards below set out the claim types side by side.

Supplement advertising and FTC substantiation

FDA’s rule decides what a supplement label may say. The FTC decides whether an ad’s claims are backed, and the two apply together. The FTC’s guide notes that it does not require notification for structure/function claims, but that FDA does, and that advertisers need a reasonable basis for product claims before they run an ad. For health claims that basis is a rigorous one. Dietary supplement advertising therefore begins with a file of evidence, not a creative brief.

The 2022 Health Products Compliance Guidance

The FTC’s Health Products Compliance Guidance, dated December 2022, replaced the agency’s 1998 guide, Dietary Supplements: An Advertising Guide for Industry. It is staff guidance and, in its own words, does not have the force or effect of law. It does show how FTC staff apply the law to foods, supplements, drugs and other health products, and it is the document an advertising lawyer opens first. Claims about the benefits or safety of those products generally need “competent and reliable scientific evidence.”

Does the evidence match the product, the dose and the claim?

As a general matter, the guide says, substantiation of health benefits will need to be randomized, controlled human clinical testing. It also asks whether the research is relevant to the specific product and the specific benefit advertised, and it prompts the advertiser with questions about dosage and formulation, because a study of one dose or form does not automatically support a claim for another. The body of evidence around a claim matters too. The guide says the totality of the evidence affects how a claim must be presented, and that when stronger surrounding evidence runs contrary to a claimed effect, even a qualified claim is likely to be deceptive. One favorable study is where a claims file starts, not where it ends.

Express claims, implied claims and the net impression

Marketers answer for what an ad says outright and for what it reasonably suggests. The guide tells advertisers to judge an ad by its net impression, meaning the text, the product name, charts, graphs and images taken together. When an ad can reasonably be read in more than one way, the advertiser must be able to substantiate each reading. Creative review should therefore check the picture and the headline against each other and not each alone.

Qualifiers and fine print

Words like “may” and “helps” do not rescue a claim the evidence does not carry; the guide calls vague qualifying terms inadequate. A disclosure cannot contradict the claim it sits under, and it has to be clear and conspicuous, which the guide does not find in small print at the bottom of an ad. The same goes for “results not typical” on dramatic testimonials. The guide says such lines do not cure the deception and calls for a clear disclosure of the results a typical consumer can achieve.

A claims file for every product

A claims file is the brand’s record of what each product says and why it is allowed to say it. On our CPG page the rule is stated plainly: copy is written to the brand’s regulatory guidance and reviewed by the brand, and we do not write claims the label cannot support. A claims file is how that guidance reaches the people writing ads.

Supplement influencer marketing, testimonials and reviews under FTC rules

Creators, reviews and customer stories sell supplements, and two FTC texts cover them: the Endorsement Guides, 16 CFR Part 255 (revised in 2023) and the Rule on the Use of Consumer Reviews and Testimonials, 16 CFR Part 465 (2024). Any influencer marketing program for a supplement brand has to work inside both.

Are testimonials evidence?

No. The Endorsement Guides say consumer endorsements are not themselves competent and reliable scientific evidence, and that claims made through endorsements need the same substantiation as claims the advertiser makes directly. A story about one customer’s result also tells readers the result is typical. If the brand cannot show that it is, the ad should clearly and conspicuously disclose the generally expected performance. The Guides report that the FTC tested “results not typical” and a stronger “you are not likely to have similar results” line, and that neither adequately reduced the impression that the experience shown was representative.

Is free product a material connection?

Yes. The Guides say a connection that viewers would not expect must be disclosed clearly and conspicuously, and that free or discounted products count, whether or not the brand requires a post in return. They give a vitamin example: an influencer paid to endorse a vitamin who discloses the connection only on a profile page has not made a clear and conspicuous disclosure, because people seeing the posts could easily miss it, and a disclosure behind a link labeled “more” has the same problem. The brand can be liable for a deceptive endorsement even when the creator is not, so the Guides tell advertisers to guide their endorsers, monitor them and act on non-compliance. A creator brief should list the claims the creator may make, the disclosure to use and where it goes.

What the 2024 reviews rule bans

Part 465 deals with reviews on a brand’s own site and across the web. Among the practices it bans:

• Writing or selling reviews or testimonials that misrepresent that the reviewer exists or used the product.
• Paying or giving incentives for reviews that express a particular sentiment, positive or negative.
• Reviews by officers or managers that hide the relationship to the business.
• Company-run websites that falsely present themselves as independent review sources.
• Review suppression through threats, or showing only the good reviews while implying they are all of them.
• Buying or selling fake followers, views or likes for commercial purposes.

The rule also defines a clear and conspicuous disclosure on social media and the internet as one that is unavoidable, so a disclosure a viewer has to click or hover to see does not qualify.

Supplement ads on Facebook and Instagram

Meta applies its own layer on top of the law. Three of its advertising standards bear on supplements: health and wellness, drugs and pharmaceuticals and personal attributes. They were read on Meta’s site in October 2026. Supplement Facebook ads and Instagram ads are reviewed against all three, and our Facebook ads team writes to them.

Adults only for weight and supplement ads

Meta’s health and wellness standard requires ads for weight loss products and for supplements to be targeted to people who are at least 18 years old. Set the age floor in the ad set, not in the copy, and check it again whenever audiences are duplicated or widened.

No personal health attributes in the copy

Meta’s personal attributes standard says ads must not contain content that asserts or implies personal attributes, and that includes physical or mental health and medical conditions. Its own example of what is not allowed is a headline that asks “Do you have diabetes?”, while a line announcing that a new diabetes treatment is available is allowed. For a supplement the allowed side of that example is no help, because a treatment claim is a disease claim under FDA’s rule. Write about the product, its ingredients and how it is used, not about the reader’s condition.

Outcomes, timeframes and appearance

The health and wellness standard also rules out statements of inferiority about physical appearance, promises of specific outcomes within a set timeframe without disclaimers or qualifiers, and claims to cure, heal or eliminate the incurable diseases and terminal illnesses it lists. The drugs and pharmaceuticals standard prohibits unsafe substances, products or supplements, as Meta determines at its sole discretion. Because Meta decides what counts as unsafe at its sole discretion, an ad that follows every rule above can still be refused, so a brand should budget for appeals and keep its claims file ready to answer one.

Google Ads rules for supplements: unapproved substances and unreliable claims

Google’s rules for supplements come from three of its policy pages: healthcare and medicines, its list of unapproved pharmaceuticals and supplements and unreliable claims. A PPC management team should read all three before building the account.

The unapproved pharmaceuticals and supplements list

Under unapproved substances, Google does not allow the promotion of certain products “regardless of any claims of legality.” The page lists all items on its non-exhaustive list of unapproved pharmaceuticals and supplements, plus:

• Products that contain ephedra.
• Products containing human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in relation to weight loss or weight control, or promoted alongside anabolic steroids.
• Herbal and dietary supplements with active pharmaceutical or dangerous ingredients.
• Products that imply they are as effective as prescription drugs or controlled substances.
• Products that are not government approved but are marketed as safe or effective for preventing, curing or treating a particular disease or ailment.
• Products that have been subject to any government or regulatory action or warning, and products with names confusingly similar to an unapproved product.
• DHEA, except in campaigns targeting the United States.

Weight loss and testimonial claims

The unreliable claims policy bars miracle cures and claims of unrealistic weight loss within a specific time frame or requiring little effort. Its own example is an ad saying you can eat whatever you want and lose ten pounds in a month. Testimonials that claim specific results must include a visible disclaimer stating that there is no guarantee of specific results and that results can vary. If an ad guarantees results, Google requires a clear and easily accessible refund policy. The policy adds that Google may defer to local regulatory guidelines on health claims, so an ad that is acceptable here can still be refused elsewhere.

TikTok and Amazon: supplement ads in feeds and on marketplaces

Short video and marketplaces each add a rule that the brand’s own site never faces. TikTok ads are reviewed against TikTok’s weight management and body image policy. Amazon verifies supplements through third-party testing, which affects whether a listing can sell at all; our Amazon marketing agency and Amazon SEO pages cover the listing and advertising side.

TikTok’s weight management rules

TikTok’s weight management policy, which shows a last update of September 2026, says ad content and landing pages for weight-related products must not include exaggerated or harmful weight loss or muscle gain claims. Any such claim must be restricted to audiences aged 18 or older and made through the promotion of a healthy lifestyle. Not allowed are claims that a product alone, without diet or exercise, can lead to weight loss or muscle gain, and suggestions that losing weight or gaining muscle is easy or guaranteed. For the United States and Canada the policy lists weight loss supplements among the products that may be allowed, subject to age restrictions, local licensing requirements and compliance with all advertising policies. Its body image rules also bar explicit body shaming and the suggestion that there is an ideal body type.

Amazon’s third-party testing requirement

Amazon’s announcement in its seller forums says that effective April 2, 2024, dietary supplement products need to be verified through a third-party Testing, Inspection, and Certification (TIC) organization. The Manage Your Compliance dashboard shows the listings that need action and their due dates, and listings may be removed if they are not confirmed compliant by the due date. A seller starts a test for each product with one of the TIC organizations through that dashboard. Amazon’s help pages on the policy sit behind seller sign-in, so this section states only what the announcement says; check Seller Central for the current requirements for your products.

Supplement ads that work inside the rules

Supplement ads that work are specific about what the product is and how it is used, and plain about what it does. The best supplement ads read like a good label turned into a story: the ingredients, the amounts, who it is for and when someone takes it. A useful supplement advertising example is a pattern more than a campaign, so the table below sets out original patterns for five product types. They are illustrative, written for this page, and not drawn from any brand’s ads.

Ingredient, routine and sourcing creative

Three kinds of nutritional supplement ads hold up under review. Ingredient creative explains what is in the product and why each ingredient is there, in the amounts the label shows. Routine creative shows when and how someone takes it, with the directions from the label. Sourcing creative describes where ingredients come from and how the product is made, but only where each statement is true and documented. None of the three needs a claim about disease, so none of them depends on the wording that the rules above treat most strictly.

Diet supplement ads and weight loss supplement ads

Diet supplement ads and weight loss supplement ads sit under the strictest rules on this page. Meta and TikTok limit them to adults. Google and TikTok reject unrealistic results, effortless results and results promised within a time frame, and TikTok adds that a product cannot be shown as working without diet or exercise. Body shaming is out on TikTok, and Meta bars statements of inferiority about appearance. Weight loss supplement ads that obey all of these tend to be quiet: the product, the directions, the adult audience and a healthy-lifestyle frame. The unapproved list in Google’s policy still applies to the product itself, whatever the ad says.

Static, video and creator formats

Static images suit ingredient breakdowns and label close-ups. Short video suits routines and how-to-use demonstrations. Creator content suits the days-in-a-life style of routine, as long as the creator brief carries the approved claims and the disclosure described above. Whatever the format, the landing page the ad opens must carry the same wording and the same disclaimer, since the FTC judges the net impression of the whole experience.

Vitamin advertising and vitamin marketing

Vitamins feel safe to advertise because buyers know them, but the same rules apply: a vitamin label is a supplement label, and a vitamin ad is a supplement ad. Vitamin advertising differs from the rest of the category in product shape more than in rules. Vitamin marketing means persuading a buyer to pick one pack over a shelf of near-identical ones, and the reason has to be true, specific and on file. A vitamin marketing agency earns its keep on that reason, not on volume of ads.

Multivitamins and daily packs

A multivitamin competes on trust, convenience and format: what is in it, how it is taken and whether the form suits the buyer. Daily packs and subscriptions add a routine to the pitch. The ad can repeat what the label says and can add a structure/function statement only if the claims file supports it and the notice to FDA has been made. The quickest way to lose a multivitamin ad is an implied promise, such as a name or an image that suggests treating a condition.

Single-nutrient products

A single-nutrient product, such as calcium or vitamin C, is where the statute’s deficiency-disease route matters. A claim about a classical nutrient deficiency disease is allowed only if the statement also says how common that disease is in the United States, and FDA’s page uses vitamin C and scurvy as its example. Most single-nutrient brands never use that route and stay with structure/function statements. Either way, the product page should state the amount per serving and the directions plainly.

Subscriptions and auto-renewal

Subscriptions suit vitamins because people take them daily, and automatic renewal carries federal and state rules of its own. Our DTC marketing agency page covers them under subscriptions and state auto-renewal laws.

Supplement packaging design and the label

Supplement packaging design is where claims physically live. The front panel carries the name and any headline claim; the back and sides carry the directions and the label panels. 101.93 requires the disclaimer on each panel or page that carries a statement, beside the statement or tied to it by a symbol such as an asterisk, in boldface type at least one-sixteenth inch, and in a box when it is not adjacent. A layout that leaves no room for the disclaimer is a layout that will be redrawn.

Vitamin packaging design has the same constraints on a different shelf. The pack has to be recognized at a glance in a store aisle or as a marketplace thumbnail and still hold the claims file’s wording. A vitamin branding agency that treats the disclaimer as an afterthought hands the brand a pack its reviewer must reject. Names, icons and imagery carry claims too, so identity work goes through the same review as copy.

Our branding agency page covers identity and packaging design, and our food packaging and label design page covers the label work for edible products. The brand’s regulatory reviewer signs off on the final label before it goes to print; the design team’s job is to make the approved wording legible and to keep the layout flexible when wording changes.

Supplement SEO, content and AI answers

Supplement SEO is content work with a compliance filter. Shoppers search for ingredients, doses, comparisons and safety questions, and the pages that answer them plainly are the pages search engines and AI assistants quote. Vitamin SEO follows the same pattern for single-nutrient and multivitamin searches. Our SEO services and ecommerce SEO pages describe the program.

Ingredient and use pages that stay inside claim rules

An ingredient page states what the ingredient is, the amount in the product, how the product is taken, who should check with a clinician first and what the product’s evidence does and does not cover. It describes an ingredient’s role in normal function only where the claims file supports it, and it keeps away from disease. Supplement content marketing built on these pages compounds, because each page also feeds product pages and email. Supplement copywriting for them is plain, short and consistent with the label.

What AI assistants cite for supplement questions

People put questions about ingredients, doses and safety to AI assistants as well as to search engines. We make no claim about what any assistant will say about a brand. What a brand controls is whether its own pages state the facts in a form that is easy to quote: the ingredient, the amount, the directions, the date reviewed and a plain statement of what is not claimed. Our AEO page covers the method.

Supplement website design, landing pages and email

Supplement website design starts from the claims file, like everything else. A product page has to answer the buyer’s questions and carry the same wording, and the same disclaimer placement, as the ad that sent them there. A supplement landing page for paid traffic is narrower: one product, one offer, the directions and amounts, the disclaimer, the refund terms and a clear path to buy. Because the FTC reads the net impression of the whole experience, the ad and the page have to agree.

Our ecommerce website design and website design and development pages cover the build; the fixed-scope prices are in the cost section below. Supplement email marketing follows the purchase: replenishment messages timed to how long a pack lasts, ingredient and routine content, and a clear way to change or cancel. Our ecommerce email marketing page describes the programs, and every message goes through the same claims review as an ad.

Supplement brand marketing from launch to retail

Supplement brand marketing is a sequence, and skipping steps costs more than it saves. Marketing supplements well means deciding what to say before deciding where to say it. How to market supplements without constant rework is mostly a matter of order: claims, label, site and tracking first, then one product on one channel, then more. How to grow a supplement brand after launch comes down to adding a channel only once the first one is being read properly.

Before launch: claims file, label, site and tracking

Write the claims file, finish the label with the disclaimer in place, build the product page, and install tracking that ties each first order to its channel. Check which ad platforms accept the product type and what each needs, including third-party testing if the product will sell on Amazon. Launching with a claims question still open means ads that may have to be pulled.

Launch: one hero product, one channel, one offer

Start with the product that has the strongest evidence and the clearest reason to buy, on the channel where its buyers already look, with one offer. Paid social or search usually carries the first tests, with email capture on the landing page from the first day. A narrow launch is easier to review, easier to measure and easier to fix.

Growth: marketplace, retail and repeat purchase

Once the first channel is read, add the next: a marketplace listing, more products, creators with written briefs, and retail conversations backed by the data from the first channel. Repeat purchase is the center of the economics for most supplements, so subscription and replenishment email belong in the plan early.

Measuring supplement marketing

A supplement program is measured on new customers, what each costs, whether they come back and what is left after costs. Reach and clicks are context. Compliance has its own measures, because an ad rejected or a claim unreviewed is a cost too. The cards below list seven numbers to ask for every month; we quote no benchmark values, because they differ by product, price and channel.

Read the numbers in this order: first orders and their cost, then repeat and subscription rate, then margin after ad spend and fees. Ad rejections and claim reviews sit beside them as operating measures, and a rise in rejections is a prompt to check the claims file before the next launch.

How to choose a supplement marketing agency

Supplement marketing agencies differ less in the channels they name than in how they handle claims, ad accounts and ownership. Choosing a supplement marketing agency comes down to a short list of direct questions, and the answers should be in writing.

Questions about claims review and ad account history

Ask these and expect specific answers:

• Who decides what a claim may say, and what do you do when you disagree?
• How does a claim get from the claims file into an ad, and how is it checked before launch?
• What do you do when an ad is rejected, and who handles the appeal?
• How do you keep ad accounts in good standing across Meta, Google and TikTok?
• Do you write any claim the label cannot support? (Ours is no.)

Questions about Amazon, creators and ownership

Ask who owns the accounts and assets. Our answer on the CPG page is that the brand does, including creative and creator usage rights, and every package on our social pricing page includes owner-level access to your accounts. Then ask:

• How do you handle third-party testing and listing compliance on Amazon?
• What is in a creator brief, and who checks the disclosure on each post?
• Can we see the raw numbers and the ad accounts directly?
• What is in writing about scope, notice and renewal?

Red flags

Treat any of these as a reason to keep looking:

• Calling a supplement “FDA approved.” FDA’s page says structure/function claims are not pre-approved.
• Sales pages or ads built on dramatic transformation stories, which raise the typicality problem described above.
• Guaranteed results, or results promised within a set number of days.
• Buying reviews or followers, which the 2024 reviews rule bans.
• A claim for a disease, or a name or image that implies one.
• No written scope, or no access to your own ad accounts.

What does a supplement marketing agency cost?

What a supplement marketing agency costs depends on the channels, the number of products and how much creative and review each one needs. The sections below keep our own prices apart from market figures, and media, testing, creator fees and production are always paid on top of both.

Our prices

Paid social, paid search, Amazon management, creator programs and packaging are quoted after a written scope. Social packages, SEO and website builds have published prices on the social media pricing, SEO services and website design and development pages. Each social package includes owner-level access to your accounts, thirty days notice and no automatic renewal.

What the market charges

Other providers publish the following figures, shown from the typical low through the published high. They are not a Progression quote:

Media, testing, creators and production are separate

Ad spend goes to the platforms, and creator fees go to the creators. Product testing and any certification, including the third-party testing Amazon requires, are paid to the testing organization and vary by product, so we quote no testing fees. Photography, video and packaging production beyond what a package states are quoted separately. A written scope lists each of these before work starts.

More pages on the services around supplement brands:

• Wellness marketing agency
• Amazon marketing agency
• Facebook ads
• Influencer marketing
• Ecommerce website design
• DTC marketing agency

Frequently asked questions