Reading Brand Advertising Case Studies

Updated September 2026 · Written and maintained by the Progression Agency strategy team

Brand advertising case studies are the most-read and least-useful genre in marketing writing. They describe what a company did, attribute its success to that, and omit everything that cannot be seen from outside — the budget, the distribution deal, the timing, the failures that preceded it. This page does something narrower and more honest: it separates what is genuinely observable about a few widely-studied brands from what is inferred, explains which mechanisms transfer to a business without their resources, and gives you a method for reading any case study without drawing the wrong conclusion from it.

Louis Vuitton marketing is worth setting beside the other examples here because it demonstrates a strategy most brands cannot use and can still learn from. Marketing Louis Vuitton, or any comparable maison, depends on scarcity maintained deliberately: distribution is controlled, the product is rarely discounted, and the brand’s presence in culture is bought through patronage, collaboration and spectacle rather than through performance advertising. The observable pattern is that the advertising sells the world rather than the object, and the object is then sold in an environment the brand fully controls. The transferable lesson is narrow but real: where a brand can control its distribution, discounting becomes optional, and a brand that never discounts is making a promise about value that customers can verify over years.

Two more worked examples: Gucci customers and Warby Parker

Gucci’s target market is instructive because the visible advertising and the revenue base are aimed at different people. Gucci target customers, in the brand’s own reported terms, skew substantially younger than luxury historically did, while much of the volume sits in accessible entry products rather than ready-to-wear. Gucci technology investment has followed the same logic — digital flagship experiences, in-app try-on and gaming partnerships aimed at an audience that will not buy a runway piece this year and may in ten. Warby Parker branding is the counter-example worth setting beside it: a category where the incumbent’s pricing was the entire story, addressed by a brand built on a single legible claim about price and access, with the home try-on program functioning as both a distribution mechanism and the proof of the claim. One brand sells aspiration at the top and monetizes at the bottom; the other collapses the ladder entirely. Both work, and the reason each works is structural rather than aesthetic.

Reading a luxury brand target market: the Gucci example

Luxury advertising is frequently misread because the visible campaign is not aimed at the person who buys most of the volume. The Gucci target market, as the brand’s own reporting and industry analysis describe it, skews substantially younger than luxury historically did — the house’s returns since the mid-2010s have been attributed publicly to millennial and Gen Z demand — while the revenue mix still leans heavily on accessible entry products rather than ready-to-wear. That combination explains the advertising: the imagery signals to an aspirational audience that will buy a small leather good or a fragrance, while the runway work maintains the credibility that makes the entry product worth its price. The transferable lesson is that in categories with a wide price ladder, brand advertising is usually addressed to the top of the ladder and monetized at the bottom, and judging such a campaign against direct-response metrics misses what it is built to do.

Why brand case studies mislead

Because they present observable behavior and inferred causation together, while omitting everything that would let you test whether the one caused the other. Budget, distribution agreements, timing, and the campaigns that failed are all invisible from outside, and all four frequently matter more than the strategy being described.

The scorecard splits cleanly: everything you can observe is about behavior, and everything you cannot observe is about causation. A case study that draws a causal conclusion is therefore reasoning from the half of the evidence it does not have.

Survivorship is the worst of the failures

Only successes get written up. For every documented company that grew using a particular tactic, there are undocumented companies that used the same tactic and did not, and nobody writes those up. This makes any tactic look more reliable than it is, and it is invisible in the individual article.

Authorship matters more than quality

A large share of published case studies are written by the agency that ran the work. That does not make them false and it does make them sales documents, selected for outcome and framed for credit. Check the byline before the argument.

Tactics expire, structures do not

A channel arbitrage that worked in 2016 does not work now, because the arbitrage closed. A structural choice — removing steps from a purchase, owning your customer data — is as true now as it was then. When reading anything, ask which of the two you are looking at.

A method for reading any case study

Six questions: what is observable, what is inferred, what is invisible, who wrote it, what is the counterfactual, and what is the mechanism stripped of the brand name. The last question is the only one whose answer you can use.

Gucci advertising: what is observable

Gucci is a luxury house whose advertising is publicly visible, heavily art-directed and distinctive, and whose brand assets have been maintained over a very long period. Those three things are observable from outside. The budget, the media agreements and the internal results are not, and this page does not state them.

What is genuinely instructive about a luxury house is not the creative work, which most businesses could not use and could not afford. It is the discipline: recognisable assets applied consistently over decades, scarcity maintained deliberately rather than discounted away, and distribution controlled tightly. All three are decisions, and two of the three are available at any size.

What transfers from luxury advertising

Consistency and restraint. A small business that uses the same typeface, the same colors and the same tone for five years accumulates recognition that a business rebranding every eighteen months never will. That is the cheapest advantage in marketing and almost nobody takes it, because consistency is boring to the people producing it long before it is boring to the audience.

What does not transfer

The scale, the heritage, the celebrity association and the media budget. A campaign built on fame reaching more fame does not scale down; it simply becomes expensive photography. Reading a luxury case study for tactics is the clearest example of the error this page is about.

Warby Parker advertising: the mechanism worth copying

The observable mechanism is friction removal. Buying prescription eyewear traditionally required a shop visit, and the company built a purchase process that did not. Whatever else is true, that structural choice is visible from outside and it is the part that transfers.

It is worth being precise about what is being claimed. We are describing a publicly observable business model, not asserting a causal explanation of the company’s results, which would require data nobody outside it has. The transferable observation is narrow and useful: the company identified the single step that stopped people buying and removed it.

Ask what your equivalent step is

Every business has one — a form that is too long, a quote that takes three days, a delivery date that is not shown, a returns policy that is hidden, a phone number nobody answers after five. Finding and removing it costs nothing and it is the closest thing to a universal lesson in this entire genre.

Owning the customer relationship

Selling directly rather than exclusively through intermediaries means holding the customer data, the email relationship and the ability to talk to buyers again. That is a structural advantage available to almost any business, and it compounds in a way advertising does not.

Apostrophe and the direct-to-consumer health model

Searches for apostrophe skincare are mostly people researching the service rather than studying its marketing, and it is worth answering that intent honestly: it is a telehealth-style prescription skincare service, and questions about suitability, prescriptions and pricing belong to the company and to a clinician rather than to a marketing page.

The marketing-relevant observation is structural again. Prescription categories carry regulatory constraints on claims, which forces the marketing toward education rather than assertion — explaining what a condition is, what treatment involves and what to expect. That constraint turns out to be an advantage, because educational content is exactly what people search for.

Regulated categories: the constraint that helps

When you cannot make strong claims, you have to be useful instead. Businesses in unregulated categories can assert things and frequently do, which produces marketing nobody trusts. The discipline of being accurate is worth adopting whether or not a regulator requires it.

CPG brands: why the category is studied so often

Consumer packaged goods are studied because the category is enormous, the products are familiar, and the marketing is visible to everybody. It is also the category whose lessons transfer worst, because CPG economics depend on shelf distribution, trade spend and scale that almost no reader of a case study has.

People searching cpg brands are usually doing one of three things: looking for a list of companies, researching the industry as a job market, or studying its marketing. All three are legitimate and only the third is served by a case study, which is worth knowing before you write one.

What CPG actually teaches

Distribution beats advertising. A product on the shelf at eye level in ten thousand stores outsells a better product nobody stocks, and much of what reads as brilliant CPG marketing is the visible surface of a distribution position. For a small business the equivalent question is where your product or service is encountered, not what your advertisement says.

Why CPG tactics invert at small scale

Mass awareness advertising works when a small percentage shift across a huge audience pays for it. At small scale the same spend reaches too few people to produce that shift, which is why brand-awareness campaigns copied from CPG reliably disappoint smaller businesses. The mechanism requires the scale; it is not scale-independent.

The right-hand column is the one worth reading twice. Each of these is genuinely instructive about one narrow thing and routinely cited as evidence for something much broader.

Which mechanisms actually transfer?

Removing purchase friction, owning the customer relationship, staying consistent for years, and answering buying questions publicly. All four are structural, all four are cheap, and all four are copied far less often than the tactics that do not transfer.

The quadrant chart is the practical summary of this page. Everything on the left is a structural choice available at any size and moves results substantially. Everything on the right belongs to that company’s circumstances. Most case-study writing dwells on the right-hand side because it is more interesting to read.

How to verify a claim in a case study

Look for a primary source, check whether figures are attributed, check the date, ask who benefits from the framing, and check whether the result has been repeated. Unattributed numbers travel fastest and are the least reliable.

The right-hand column is not cynicism, it is the base rate. Applying these tests to a well-known case study is a useful exercise precisely because the tests usually fail, which recalibrates how much weight the genre deserves.

Direct-to-consumer: the model behind several of these

Answer first: selling directly rather than through intermediaries changes who owns the customer relationship, who sets the price, and who carries the acquisition cost. It is a distribution decision that gets written up as a marketing story.

Why the acquisition cost question decides everything

Answer first: a direct model shifts the cost of finding customers from the retailer to you. That works when repeat purchase or lifetime value is high and fails when it is not, which is why the same model produces both celebrated and failed companies in the same category.

Retail versus direct: the trade-off in plain terms

Answer first: retail gives you distribution and takes your margin and your customer data. Direct gives you margin and data and hands you the acquisition problem. Neither is superior; they suit different products and different repeat rates.

The last row is the honest summary. Every celebrated direct-to-consumer story is a bet that lifetime value will outrun acquisition cost, and the stories that got written up are the ones where it did.

What a good case study looks like

Answer first: it states what was done, what changed at the same time, what cannot be attributed, and what the author’s relationship to the work is. Very few do all four, and the ones that do are worth more than a dozen that do not.

Writing honest case studies about your own work

Answer first: describe the mechanism, name what else changed, and decline to claim causation you cannot demonstrate. A case study that acknowledges its limits reads as more credible, not less, to the people capable of buying from you.

The last row is counterintuitive and reliably true: stating what you cannot claim makes everything you do claim more believable. It is also the single easiest way to distinguish your case studies from the genre they sit in.

Benchmarks: why most of them are unusable

Answer first: most published marketing benchmarks come from vendor surveys of self-selected customers, which makes them a description of that vendor’s client base rather than of your industry. Check the methodology and the sample before using any figure as a target.

Your own data beats any benchmark

Answer first: your conversion rate last quarter is a better target than an industry average, because it controls for your product, your price, your audience and your market. Benchmarks are useful for orientation and useless as goals.

When copying a competitor is reasonable

Answer first: when you can see the mechanism rather than infer it, when your economics resemble theirs, and when you would still do it if they had not. Copying an execution you cannot explain is how companies end up with expensive marketing nobody internally understands.

The three questions that make any case study useful

Answer first: what is the mechanism, does it survive at my scale, and what would I have to be true for it to work here. If you can answer all three, the case study has done its job. If you cannot answer the first, close the tab.

Where to find better evidence than case studies

Answer first: company filings for public companies, platform documentation for how a channel actually works, regulator guidance for what may be claimed, and your own tests for everything else. All four are primary sources; a case study almost never is.

The ordering is by how much the source’s interests are aligned with getting the answer right rather than with a particular answer. Your own test sits top because nobody is selling you its conclusion.

What to do instead of copying a case study

Run the four structural checks on your own business, in order: what step stops people buying, whether you own the customer relationship, whether your identity has been consistent long enough to be recognized, and whether you answer the questions buyers actually ask before purchase.

1. Buy from yourself. Note every step, every field, every wait. Delete what you can.
2. Check whether you hold customer contact details you may lawfully use, or whether a platform does.
3. Look at your last three years of marketing side by side and see whether it looks like one company.
4. List the ten questions buyers ask before purchase and check whether each is answered publicly.
5. Find where your product or service is actually encountered, and whether you control that surface.
6. Photograph your own work rather than licensing stock imagery of somebody else’s.
7. Pick one of the above and do it properly rather than all six badly.

None of those require a case study, a budget or an agency. They are the mechanisms the good case studies are describing underneath the narrative, and they are available now.

Our branding services page covers the consistency question in practice, and our advertising page covers where paid media genuinely fits for a business without CPG-scale budgets.

How should you read a brand advertising case study written by the agency that made the work?

Almost every case study in circulation was written by a party with an interest in the outcome. That does not make them worthless, but it does mean reading them for structure rather than conclusion. Three questions separate evidence from a showreel.

What was the comparison?

A result reported against the period before the campaign is not a result — it is a before-and-after in a business that was also doing other things, in a market that was also moving. The useful comparisons are geographic holdouts, matched-market tests, or a genuine control group who did not see the work. When a case study reports a lift with no comparison named, the lift is the sum of the campaign and everything else that happened.

Was the metric chosen before or after the results came in?

Brand campaigns generate a large number of measurable quantities, and any campaign will move some of them. A case study reporting an unusual composite metric, or one that appears in no other case study by the same agency, was very likely selected once the data was in. The tell is specificity without precedent: awareness among a narrow subgroup, consideration on a proprietary index, sentiment measured a particular way.

What is missing from the account?

Spend is the most common omission, and without it no efficiency claim can be evaluated. Time period is second. Then whether anything else launched alongside — a price change, a distribution expansion, a product improvement — any of which would move the same numbers. A case study that names its own confounders is unusual and worth taking seriously for exactly that reason.

Survivorship is the structural problem

Nobody publishes the campaign that did nothing. Every case study you can read is drawn from the successful tail, which means the genre systematically overstates how reliably any technique works. This is not dishonesty by any individual agency; it is an artefact of what gets written up. Treat the body of published case studies as a catalog of what is possible, never as a base rate for what is likely.

What to do with one anyway

Read it for the mechanism rather than the number. Why did the agency believe this idea would change behavior, what did they think the barrier was, and does that reasoning transfer to your situation? A case study with a clearly articulated hypothesis is useful even where the results are unverifiable, and one with a spectacular number and no reasoning is not useful even if the number is true.

Advertising, brand and measurement talks from the platform publishers

Publicly available sessions on advertising effectiveness, brand building and measurement. None of these are ours; each is credited to its channel and upload date, every identifier was checked live before publication, and each tile loads its player only when clicked.

• 

  Weekly Report: PepsiCo's AI agency review signals a shift from experiments to infrastructure
  Ad Age · 2026-08-20

• 

  This AI Tool Does Keyword Research For You
  Ahrefs · 2026-07-08

• 

  How to get your product data holiday ready on Google Merchant Center
  Google Ads · 2026-08-19

• 

  Claude Cowork for Marketing: Turn Customer Data Into Copy That Converts
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-08-03

• 

  The Only Marketing Strategy You Need To Master This Year
  Neil Patel · 2026-08-20

• 

  Frontier Brief: What to do now that marketing has lost the plot
  Think with Google · 2026-08-24

• 

  Weekly Report: Dollar Tree shifts to emotional branding as it eyes $1 billion in untapped sales
  Ad Age · 2026-08-13

• 

  I Used AI Agents to Replace Our Marketing Agency
  Ahrefs · 2026-06-10

• 

  How to measure store visits and sales in Google Ads Performance Max
  Google Ads · 2026-08-10

• 

  How to Use Instagram Instants for Business (Step-by-Step Guide)
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-07-29

• 

  The Only Marketing Strategy That Is Working In 2026
  Neil Patel · 2026-08-12

• 

  The New Era of Agency Partnerships: What Marketers Want in 2026
  Think with Google · 2026-08-06

• 

  Why marketers chase active demand and miss the passive majority, with Indeed's CMO
  Ad Age · 2026-08-12

• 

  Why I Switched from ChatGPT to Claude
  Ahrefs · 2026-06-03

• 

  How to set up Performance Max for store goals in Google Ads
  Google Ads · 2026-08-10

• 

  How to Set Up Your LinkedIn Profile in just 10 Minutes (Using AI)
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-07-27

• 

  I'm Betting My Entire Marketing Strategy On This One Shift
  Neil Patel · 2026-08-05

• 

  Why Marketers Have Lost the Plot in the Age of AI
  Think with Google · 2026-08-06

• 

  Turning consumer signals into campaigns that work, with Kayak's senior VP of brand marketing
  Ad Age · 2026-08-05

• 

  Your AEO Strategy + Action Plan Checklist | 4.2. AEO Course by Ahrefs
  Ahrefs · 2026-05-18

• 

  Community Q&A: August 17 bidding update
  Google Ads · 2026-08-05

• 

  I Built a Complete AI Email Marketing System in 16 Minutes (Prompts Included)
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-07-21

• 

  The TikTok Shop Strategy Nobody Talks About
  Neil Patel · 2026-07-15

• 

  Frontier Brief: What it takes to lead marketing at Google during the AI revolution
  Think with Google · 2026-08-03

• 

  Meet the Calvin Klein CMO using 'entertainment mentality' to turn culturally resonant campaigns i…
  Ad Age · 2026-07-29

• 

  How to Track AI Traffic in GA4 and Ahrefs Web Analytics (ChatGPT & More) | 4.1. AEO Course by Ahrefs
  Ahrefs · 2026-05-18

• 

  Google Ads Spending Limits: Master Your Daily Budget [Tutorial]
  Google Ads · 2026-08-03

• 

  5 Social Media Trends Actually Working in 2026 (HubSpot Report)
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-07-14

• 

  The One-Person Marketing Era Has Officially Begun
  Neil Patel · 2026-07-08

• 

  Inside Nescafé's Global YouTube Creator Strategy with Zach King | Nescafé
  Think with Google · 2026-07-29

• 

  Lessons from America's Hottest Brands
  Ad Age · 2026-07-22

• 

  YouTube SEO for AI Search: How to Rank your YouTube Videos | 3.3. AEO Course by Ahrefs
  Ahrefs · 2026-05-13

• 

  Fix disapproved Google Ads: A guide to Personalized advertising compliance
  Google Ads · 2026-08-03

• 

  The Free AEO Tool Stack to get Your Brand Promoted By AI
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-07-08

• 

  How I Would Master Social Media in 2026 (If Starting From Zero)
  Neil Patel · 2026-06-03

• 

  Best of Frontier CMO: The Audience is in Charge with Colin and Samir
  Think with Google · 2026-07-23

• 

  Weekly Report: Starbucks' Culture Play, Predictive AI Targeting, Emmy-Nominated Ads
  Ad Age · 2026-07-16

• 

  Brand Mentions for SEO: How to Get Cited by AI (3 Tiers) | 3.2. AEO Course by Ahrefs
  Ahrefs · 2026-05-13

• 

  Google Call Ads: Supplemental Terms & Compliance
  Google Ads · 2026-08-03

• 

  How to Create a WhatsApp Chatbot for Your Business (No Coding)
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-07-06

• 

  5 Signs Your AI SEO Strategy Is About to Take Off
  Neil Patel · 2026-05-27

• 

  Frontier Brief: Liquid Death’s unexpected recipe for marketing success
  Think with Google · 2026-07-20

• 

  2026 ad budget check-in: where media money’s moving, with Brandon Doerrer
  Ad Age · 2026-07-10

• 

  How to Optimize Content for AI Search Engines | 3.1. AEO Course by Ahrefs
  Ahrefs · 2026-05-13

• 

  Google Ads Asset Studio: AI Tools & Asset Management Guide
  Google Ads · 2026-08-03

• 

  I Charge $2,000 for This Content Strategy (Copy Me)
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-06-29

• 

  The Old SEO System Is Collapsing. Here's What Replaces It.
  Neil Patel · 2026-05-20

• 

  Lightning in a Can: Liquid Death’s Killer Creative
  Think with Google · 2026-07-09

• 

  Why data, not AI, is driving local travel marketing decisions, with Vrbo's VP of marketing
  Ad Age · 2026-07-08

• 

  Keyword & Prompt Research for AI SEO (AEO) | 2.2. AEO Course by Ahrefs
  Ahrefs · 2026-05-06

• 

  Create effective Search ads: Responsive search ads for success (2026)
  Google Ads · 2026-08-03

• 

  How to Run ChatGPT Ads: The Complete Tutorial
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-06-22

• 

  5 AI CEOs Said the Same Thing About 2026 (Marketing Changes Forever)
  Neil Patel · 2026-05-13

• 

  Frontier Brief: What CMOs can learn from McLaren’s race to the top
  Think with Google · 2026-06-29

• 

  Why retailers should sell experiences, not products, with Macy's CMO
  Ad Age · 2026-07-01

• 

  How to Run a Brand Gap Analysis | 2.1. AEO Course by Ahrefs
  Ahrefs · 2026-05-05

• 

  How to Link accounts to your Google Ads Manager Account – Step-by-Step process
  Google Ads · 2026-07-30

• 

  How to Optimize Your Profile for LinkedIn's New AI Algorithm
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-06-17

• 

  The Marketing Opportunity of a Decade (But Not for Long)
  Neil Patel · 2026-04-22

• 

  Will AI take the soul out of creative? 🎬
  Think with Google · 2026-06-29

• 

  What brands are missing in sports sponsorship, with Just Women's Sports Founder
  Ad Age · 2026-06-24

• 

  What Is AI Visibility? The 3 Types Every Marketer Needs to Know | 1.3. AEO Course by Ahrefs
  Ahrefs · 2026-04-29

• 

  Community Q&A: Measurement in the AI era & AI Max
  Google Ads · 2026-07-29

• 

  From Apartment Startup to Luxury Tech Brand
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-06-15

• 

  How to Save Your Marketing Job (Stop Reporting Traffic)
  Neil Patel · 2026-04-03

• 

  Exclusive look at Google’s Cannes Creative House 🚪✨
  Think with Google · 2026-06-25

• 

  From instinct to evidence: Solving marketing's growth paradox
  Ad Age · 2026-06-22

• 

  How AI Search Engines Work | 1.1. AEO Course by Ahrefs
  Ahrefs · 2026-04-29

• 

  Google Ads: Sexual content policy guide (What’s allowed?)
  Google Ads · 2026-07-22

• 

  6 AEO Trends To Get Your Brand Recommended By AI (2026 HubSpot Report)
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-06-10

• 

  You Don't Have an SEO Problem. You Have a "Brand Entity" Problem.
  Neil Patel · 2026-03-25

• 

  Frontier Brief: Marketing is a hot mess right now—and Mark Ritson is actively tearing it apart
  Think with Google · 2026-06-24

• 

  CMOs on CMOs: Hippo and Solo Stove on AI and grassroots marketing tactics
  Ad Age · 2026-06-19

• 

  Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Course by Ahrefs: What is AEO?
  Ahrefs · 2026-04-29

• 

  Community Q&A: The bidding & budgets special
  Google Ads · 2026-07-22

• 

  How to Use Substack as a Complete Beginner in 2026 (Full Tutorial)
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-06-08

• 

  Why 98% of Websites Don't Make Money (It’s Not the Design)
  Neil Patel · 2026-03-12

• 

  Mark Ritson on Why the Fundamentals Still Win
  Think with Google · 2026-06-04

• 

  How the Cadillac F1 team is racing to define its brand and fan strategy
  Ad Age · 2026-06-17

• 

  How This Site Beat Amazon in Google Search (3 Step Strategy)
  Ahrefs · 2026-04-01

• 

  GCLID Explained: What is a GCLID?
  Google Ads · 2026-07-16

• 

  How to Scale a Skincare Brand (Marketing Breakdown)
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-05-28

• 

  You're Wasting Money Trying to Get B2B Clients
  Neil Patel · 2026-03-04

• 

  Philipp Schindler at Google Marketing Live 2026
  Think with Google · 2026-05-21

• 

  Best World Cup campaigns and the new sports marketing playbook, with Tim Nudd and Jon Springer
  Ad Age · 2026-06-12

• 

  How to Pick a Niche If You’re Just Starting Out (SEO)
  Ahrefs · 2026-03-04

• 

  How to use Google Keyword Planner: Find the Best Keywords for Your Business (2026 Guide)
  Google Ads · 2026-07-15

• 

  How to Build Your First AI Agent (Step-by-step Tutorial)
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-05-26

• 

  Amazon Just Became the Google of Streaming Ads
  Neil Patel · 2026-02-25

• 

  Evolving a media network to meet growing advertiser demands with Marriott's Chris Norton
  Ad Age · 2026-06-10

• 

  Keyword Research Tutorial for Google and AI SEO
  Ahrefs · 2026-02-18

• 

  Paid Search Association AMA: AI Max Q&A
  Google Ads · 2026-07-15

• 

  How to Dominate AI Search in 2026 (Complete Tutorial for Business)
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-05-20

• 

  Why Google LOVES Reddit (And How Marketers Can Exploit It)
  Neil Patel · 2026-02-19

• 

  Publicis-LiveRamp deal: what to know and how to react, with Garett Sloane
  Ad Age · 2026-06-05

• 

  I Outsourced our Digital Marketing to AI. Here's What Happened
  Ahrefs · 2026-02-04

• 

  PPC Chat Q&A: Ads in AI Search, QFC & Creator Partnerships
  Google Ads · 2026-07-09

• 

  6 B2B Marketing Strategies Replacing the Old Playbook in 2026
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-05-11

• 

  You're Wasting Your Money on Influencer Marketing
  Neil Patel · 2026-02-11

• 

  Top SEO Experts Build Me an AI Search Strategy (GEO)
  Ahrefs · 2026-01-21

• 

  Streamline your workflow with Ask Advisor in Google Ads
  Google Ads · 2026-07-09

• 

  22 Genius Marketing Campaigns You Can Run Without a Big Budget
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-05-06

• 

  Everything you know about Marketing is changing (2026)
  Neil Patel · 2026-02-05

• 

  How to Transfer Google Ads Account to a New Agency (Billing Transfer)
  Google Ads · 2026-06-24

• 

  Do Reddit Ads Actually Work? I Ran a $100 Experiment (Full Results)
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-05-04

• 

  You’re Wasting Your Time Creating Social Media Content
  Neil Patel · 2026-01-29

• 

  Ads Data Hub: Privacy checks explained [Tutorial]
  Google Ads · 2026-06-23

• 

  3 Creator Economy Trends Every Brand Needs to Know in 2026 (HubSpot Report)
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-04-27

• 

  Google Ads Data Collection Policy: Avoid Account Suspension (2026)
  Google Ads · 2026-06-22

• 

  Anatomy of a Viral Campaign: How We Built Loop Marketing
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-04-22

• 

  Google Ads Other Restricted Businesses Policy [Avoid Disapproval Guide]
  Google Ads · 2026-06-16

• 

  Claude AI for Business: The Complete Marketing Tutorial
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-04-20

• 

  Google Ads Limited Ad Serving? How to Fix It (2026 Guide)
  Google Ads · 2026-06-15

• 

  5 NEW Email Marketing Trends That Actually Work in 2026
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-04-15

• 

  Google Ads Bidding Update: How to Maintain Predictable Performance (2026 Guide)
  Google Ads · 2026-06-12

• 

  How to Make Professional Video Ads on Any Budget (AI Finally Made It Possible)
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-04-13

• 

  Google Ads for Crypto: How to Get Certified & Avoid Bans (Tutorial)
  Google Ads · 2026-06-10

• 

  The Marketing Playbook That Helped This Gym Beat Equinox
  HubSpot Marketing · 2026-04-08

• 

  Google Ads Editorial Policy: How to Fix Ad Disapprovals
  Google Ads · 2026-06-09

• 

  How to Dispute or Change Google Ads Invoices
  Google Ads · 2026-05-28

• 

  Google Marketing Live: Backstage with our product experts
  Google Ads · 2026-05-28

Frequently asked questions