Scroll Top

Is My Marketing Agency Doing A Good Job

Updated September 2026 · Written and maintained by the Progression Agency strategy team

Evaluating an agency you already work with is a different problem from choosing one. What is knowable changes by stage, results depend partly on the channel rather than the agency, and the most expensive failure mode is not collapse but slow drift. This page sets out what is fair to judge at each stage, what a report should contain, how to run a review that produces action, and how to decide between fixing the relationship and replacing it.

The short answerJudge by stage: production and understanding early, commercial outcomes later. The clearest single signal at any point is whether the reporting proposes a change and admits what failed — a report containing only wins is not being used to make decisions. Before switching, separate capability from drift, since drift usually responds to a direct conversation while replacing an agency costs three to six months of ramp-up. And check whether the same problems followed you from a previous agency.

What becomes knowable, and when

Judge the relationship by stage, not by a single number

The most common mistake in evaluating an agency is applying a twelve-month standard in month three, or a month-three standard in month twelve. Different things are knowable at different points, and holding an engagement to the wrong one produces either premature termination or indefinite patience.

Early on, almost nothing about results is knowable. What is knowable is whether the work is being produced at the promised volume, whether the agency understood your business, and whether questions get answered. Those are process signals, and they predict outcomes better than any early metric.

Later, process stops being the point and outcomes become fair game. An agency that is still reporting activity in month twelve — posts published, hours spent, keywords tracked — without connecting it to anything commercial is telling you what it did, not whether it worked.

What is reasonable to expect at each stage
StageFair to judge onNot yet fair to judge on
Month 1–2Onboarding, access, production starting, questions answeredAny results
Month 3–4Consistent output, a documented view of what is being testedRevenue
Month 5–6Early leading indicators moving, learning documentedFull attribution
Month 7–12Commercial signal, cost per outcome, compoundingPerfection
Month 12+Business results and honest accounting of what failedNothing is off limits

Reporting that proposes nothing is not reporting

A monthly report exists to support a decision. If reading it changes nothing about what happens next month, it is a status update wearing a report’s clothes.

The test is simple: does the document say what the agency intends to do differently, and why? A report that presents rising numbers with no recommendation is as unhelpful as one presenting falling numbers with no explanation. Both leave you unable to act.

The second test is whether anything in it ever went wrong. Real programs produce failures — concepts that did not land, channels that underperformed, tests that returned nothing. A report containing only wins is not being used to make decisions, and may not be being read internally either.

Only wins — No failures ever reported. Not being used for decisions..
No recommendation — Numbers without a next step. A status update, not a report..
Same metrics for a year — Nothing has been learned. Measures should evolve..
Metric substitution — A number quietly disappears. Note which ones vanish..
Activity, not outcome — Posts, hours, keywords. Says what was done, not whether it worked..
No mention of cost — Results without spend. Return is unknowable without it..

Look for a recommendation, not a summary

The section that matters says what changes next month and why. Everything above it is evidence for that recommendation.

Check whether the metrics ever change

An agency reporting the same six numbers for a year is not learning. As a program matures, what is worth measuring should shift.

Ask what they stopped doing

Programs accumulate activity. An agency that has never discontinued anything is adding without pruning, which quietly consumes the budget.

Watch for metric substitution

When a headline number turns down, weaker agencies begin reporting a different number. Note which metrics disappear from the deck.

Separate the agency’s performance from the channel’s

Some channels underperform for reasons no agency controls, and some agencies hide behind that fact. Distinguishing the two is the core difficulty in this assessment.

The fair question is not whether results are good but whether the decisions were sound given what was knowable at the time. An agency that recommended a channel, tested it properly, measured it honestly and recommended stopping when it did not work has performed well even though the channel failed.

The unfair version is judging a considered-purchase B2B program on ninety-day revenue, or a brand campaign on direct response metrics. If the objective was never achievable in the timeframe, the agency may still be at fault — for agreeing to it — but the work itself may be sound.

The three questions that reveal most, fastest

If you only have one meeting, these three produce more signal than any report review.

First: what did you learn about our customers this quarter that we did not already know? Twelve months of work should produce insight, not only output. An agency with no answer has been executing rather than examining.

Second: what would you stop doing if it were your money? Programs accumulate activity, and an agency unable to name its own weakest component is not evaluating the work.

Third: what do you need from us that you are not getting? A meaningful share of underperformance originates on the client side, and an agency that has been raising this quietly will say so plainly when asked directly.

The three questions and what each answer tells you
QuestionA good answer sounds likeA poor answer sounds like
What did you learn about our customers?A specific, surprising, evidenced observationA restatement of what you told them at kickoff
What would you stop if it were your money?A named component and the reasoningNothing — everything is working
What do you need from us?Approvals, access, subject-matter time, faster feedbackNothing — we are fine

Signs the relationship is drifting rather than failing

Outright failure is easy to identify. The more common and more expensive pattern is slow drift, where nothing is wrong enough to act on and the value quietly declines.

The signals are relational rather than numerical. The senior people who pitched are no longer on calls. Response times lengthen. Recommendations become safer and less specific. You find yourself chasing deliverables that used to arrive. Meetings become status recitals rather than decisions. Nobody has proposed anything new in two quarters.

Drift is worth naming early because it is usually recoverable. Most agencies respond to a direct conversation about it, and the alternative — waiting until it is bad enough to justify leaving — means paying for a declining service for several more months.

Drift signals and what usually causes them
What you noticeUsual causeWhat to ask for
Senior people no longer presentAccount moved to juniors after onboardingNamed people and their time allocation
Slower responsesTheir team grew or lost staffAn agreed response window
Safer recommendationsNobody wants to risk the accountAsk what they would do with their own money
Deliverables need chasingCapacity problem elsewhereA shared, visible schedule
Status meetings, no decisionsNo agenda, no ownerAn agenda ending in decisions
No new proposalsProgram on autopilotA quarterly plan, not a monthly one

Run a structured review rather than forming an impression

Impressions accumulate and then surface all at once, usually as a decision to leave. A short written review twice a year converts that into something both sides can act on.

Cover four things: what was delivered against what was agreed, what the agency learned that you did not know before, what they recommend changing, and what they need from you that they are not getting. That last item matters — a meaningful share of underperforming engagements are starved of approvals, access or information on the client side.

Write it down and share it. An agency given a specific written assessment can respond to it. An agency given a vague sense of dissatisfaction will guess, and usually guess wrong.

A review that produces action, not an impression
Vague dissatisfaction makes an agency guess, and they usually guess wrong.

Ask what they would do with double the budget

The answer reveals whether they have a plan or are executing a template. Vague answers about more of the same are informative.

Ask what they would cut first

Equally revealing, and rarely asked. An agency that cannot name the weakest part of its own program is not evaluating it.

Ask what they need from you

Approvals, access, subject-matter time, faster feedback. Being starved of these is a common and fixable cause of underperformance.

Ask what they have learned about your customers

Twelve months of work should produce insight, not just output. If nothing has been learned, nothing was being examined.

When the honest answer is that you are the problem

This is uncomfortable and frequently true. Agencies underperform for client-side reasons more often than either party acknowledges, and switching agencies does not fix any of them.

The recurring causes are slow approvals that make timely work impossible, no access to the people who understand the product, changing objectives every quarter, a budget too small for the objective agreed, and decisions overturned by someone who was not in the room. An agency that raised these and was ignored has done its job.

The test is whether the same problems followed you from a previous agency. If they did, the next agency will encounter them too, and the money spent switching will buy a repeat of the same experience.

Deciding whether to fix it or leave

Once the assessment is done, the decision usually comes down to two questions rather than a balance of many.

First: is the problem capability or effort? An agency that cannot do the work will not learn to quickly, and no amount of pressure changes it. An agency that can but has drifted usually responds to a direct conversation, and replacing it costs three to six months of ramp-up you would not otherwise spend.

Second: has the relationship survived a difficult conversation before? Partnerships that can absorb direct criticism tend to recover. Ones where raising a problem produces defensiveness rather than a plan rarely improve, because the mechanism for improving is the thing that is broken.

Fix it or leave
SituationUsually fixableUsually not
Wrong people on the accountYes — ask for the changeIf they have nobody better
Reporting is activity, not outcomesYes — specify what you needIf they cannot measure it
Missed deliverablesYes — capacity is addressableIf it repeats after being raised
Strategy is genericSometimesIf they have no sector depth
Results poor, decisions soundYes — the channel may be wrongIf the objective was never viable
Defensive when challengedRarelyThe mechanism for improving is broken
Cost of switching versus cost of staying
FactorSwitchingStaying and fixing
Ramp-up timeThree to six months before full effectivenessNone
Institutional knowledgeLost; rebuilt from scratchRetained
CostSearch, onboarding, and duplicate fees during overlapA conversation
RiskThe next agency may share the same faultsKnown quantity
When it is rightCapability gap, or defensiveness when challengedDrift, staffing, or reporting problems

What good actually looks like

It is worth stating the positive case, because a list of warning signs makes every relationship look suspect.

A good agency tells you things you did not want to hear, early. It recommends against work that would earn it money. It reports failures alongside wins without being asked. It knows your commercial numbers, not just its channel metrics. Its recommendations change as evidence accumulates. And the people who pitched are still recognizably involved.

None of that guarantees results, because results depend on the market as well as the work. But an agency doing all of it is giving you the best available chance, and one doing none of it is not, regardless of what this quarter’s numbers happen to show.

Tells you early — Including bad news. The rarest and best signal..
Recommends against work — That would earn them money. Costly honesty is real honesty..
Reports failures unasked — Alongside the wins. Means decisions are being made..
Knows your numbers — Not just channel metrics. Optimizes to value, not volume..
Changes its mind — As evidence accumulates. Fixed plans ignore evidence..
Same people — Who pitched, still involved. Continuity is the deliverable..

Reference videos

Measurement and reporting fundamentals relevant to the assessment above.

Getting found in search

AI, AEO and what is changing

Paid media and lead generation

Websites and design

Choosing and working with an agency

Social, content and brand

By industry and by situation

Frequently asked questions

How do I know if my marketing agency is doing a good job?
Judge by stage. Early on, the fair measures are production against plan, whether they understood your business, and responsiveness. Later, whether reporting connects activity to commercial outcomes and proposes changes. A report that only contains wins and never proposes anything is the clearest warning sign at any stage.
How long before I should expect results from an agency?
Paid media produces readable signal within weeks, SEO and content take months, and brand work takes longer still. What you can fairly expect within ninety days is not results but evidence of a process: output on schedule, tests running, learning documented.
What should be in a monthly agency report?
Performance against agreed measures, what was learned, what failed, and what the agency proposes to change next month and why. If reading it does not change any decision, it is a status update rather than a report.
Is it normal for the senior people to disappear after onboarding?
Common, and worth pushing back on. Some delegation is reasonable and expected. Complete substitution of the people who won the account is a different thing, and asking for named people with named time allocations is a fair request.
My agency’s reports only ever show good news. Is that a problem?
Yes. Every real program produces concepts that did not land and tests that returned nothing. A report containing only wins is not being used to make decisions, which means decisions are being made on something else or not at all.
How do I tell whether poor results are the agency’s fault or the channel’s?
Ask whether the decisions were sound given what was knowable at the time. An agency that tested a channel properly, measured it honestly and recommended stopping has performed well even where the channel failed. One that kept spending without evidence has not.
Should I switch agencies if results are flat?
Not on that alone. Establish first whether the problem is capability or drift, because drift usually responds to a direct conversation while switching costs three to six months of ramp-up. Also check whether the same problems followed you from a previous agency.
What questions should I ask in an agency review?
What would you do with double the budget; what would you cut first; what do you need from us that you are not getting; and what have you learned about our customers. The last two are the most revealing and the least often asked.
Could we be the reason the agency is underperforming?
Frequently, yes. Slow approvals, no access to subject-matter experts, objectives that change quarterly, and decisions overturned by absent stakeholders all make good work impossible. If the same issues arose with a previous agency, they are yours rather than theirs.
How often should we formally review the relationship?
Twice a year in writing, alongside whatever monthly reporting exists. Written reviews convert accumulating impressions into something the agency can actually respond to.
Is it reasonable to ask an agency what they would do differently?
It is one of the most useful questions available, and a good agency will have an answer ready. Being unable to name the weakest part of their own program means they are not evaluating it.
What if the agency blames us for the results?
Consider whether they are right, then check whether they raised it at the time. An agency that identified a blocker early and documented it has behaved correctly. One raising it only when challenged is managing the conversation rather than the work.
Should the agency know our revenue numbers?
For anything beyond pure brand work, yes. An agency optimizing to channel metrics without knowing what a customer is worth will optimize toward cheap outcomes rather than valuable ones.
How do I raise a problem without damaging the relationship?
In writing, specifically, and early. Vague dissatisfaction produces guessing. A specific written assessment can be responded to, and how they respond tells you whether the relationship is recoverable.
Is a long contract a sign of confidence or a trap?
Neither by itself; the notice period matters more than the term. A twelve-month term with sixty days’ notice is more flexible than a rolling agreement requiring six months’ notice.
What if the work is good but the results are not?
That can be an honest outcome, and it means the strategy or the market is wrong rather than the execution. The right response is to change what is being done, not who is doing it — unless the agency cannot propose a different approach.
How do I know if my agency is out of ideas?
Nothing new proposed in two quarters, recommendations getting safer, and the same metrics reported unchanged. Programs should evolve; one on autopilot is being maintained rather than managed.
Should I hire a consultant to audit my agency?
It can help where you lack the internal expertise to judge the work, but be aware that many auditors also sell the replacement service. Ask upfront whether they would pitch for the work.
Is it fair to judge an agency on leads alone?
Only if lead generation was the agreed objective and the attribution is sound. Many programs legitimately serve awareness or retention, and judging those on lead volume measures the wrong thing.
What is the single clearest sign an agency is doing well?
They tell you things you did not want to hear, early, including recommending against work that would have earned them money. That behavior is rare and correlates with everything else worth having.

Sources and further reading

  1. Google Search Essentials — SEO starter guide
  2. Google: creating helpful, reliable, people-first content
  3. Google: intro to structured data
  4. Google: LocalBusiness structured data
  5. Google: FAQPage structured data
  6. Google: Article structured data
  7. Google: Product structured data
  8. Google: title links in search results
  9. Google: control your snippets
  10. Google: robots.txt introduction
  11. Google: sitemaps overview
  12. Google: consolidate duplicate URLs
  13. Google: redirects and Search
  14. Google: JavaScript SEO basics
  15. Google: multi-regional and multilingual sites
  16. Google Search Central Blog
  17. Google: get started with Search Console
  18. Google: how local search results are determined
  19. Google Business Profile: prohibited and restricted content
  20. Google Business Profile: address and service area guidelines
  21. Google Business Profile: review policy
  22. Google Business Profile: add or edit categories
  23. Google Ads: location targeting settings
  24. Google Ads: about negative keywords
  25. Google Ads: about Quality Score
  26. Google Ads: importing offline conversions
  27. Google Ads: about Smart Bidding
  28. Google Ads: about Performance Max
  29. Google Local Services Ads: eligibility and screening
  30. Google Ads: keyword match types
  31. Google Analytics 4: about conversions
  32. Google Analytics 4: attribution models
  33. US Census Bureau QuickFacts: New Jersey
  34. US Census Bureau: American Community Survey
  35. US Census: Statistics of US Businesses
  36. Bureau of Labor Statistics: New Jersey data
  37. BLS: Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics
  38. NJ Department of Labor: labor market information
  39. New Jersey Business Action Center
  40. US Small Business Administration: New Jersey district
  41. USA.gov: business resources
  42. web.dev: Core Web Vitals explained
  43. web.dev: Largest Contentful Paint
  44. web.dev: Cumulative Layout Shift
  45. web.dev: Interaction to Next Paint
  46. Google PageSpeed Insights
  47. Google Rich Results Test
  48. Google Search Console
  49. W3C Markup Validation Service
  50. Schema.org: LocalBusiness type
  51. Schema.org: Service type
  52. Schema.org: FAQPage type
  53. Schema.org: HowTo type
  54. W3C: WCAG 2.2 quick reference
  55. FTC: CAN-SPAM Act compliance guide
  56. FCC: telemarketing and robocall rules (TCPA)
  57. FTC endorsement guides — reviews and testimonials
  58. FTC: rule on consumer reviews and testimonials
  59. HHS: HIPAA guidance on online tracking technologies
  60. New Jersey Courts: attorney advertising guidelines
  61. New Jersey DCA: construction codes and permits
  62. New Jersey Home Improvement Contractor registration
  63. New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs
  64. TikTok for Business
  65. TikTok Creative Center
  66. TikTok Ads Help Center
  67. TikTok Community Guidelines
  68. TikTok Terms of Service
  69. TikTok Privacy Policy
  70. TikTok Safety Center
  71. TikTok Transparency Center
  72. TikTok Creator Portal
  73. TikTok Newsroom
  74. TikTok for Developers
  75. TikTok advertising solutions
  76. TikTok Creator Marketplace
  77. TikTok Business Center
  78. TikTok for Business blog
  79. TikTok Creative Center: top ads
  80. TikTok Branded Content policy
  81. TikTok Shop for sellers
  82. Instagram for Business
  83. Instagram for Creators
  84. Instagram Help Center
  85. About Instagram
  86. Meta Business Suite
  87. Meta Business Help Center
  88. Meta Transparency Center
  89. About Meta
  90. Meta: Instagram platform docs
  91. YouTube Creators
  92. YouTube Official Blog
  93. YouTube Shorts help
  94. How YouTube Works
  95. YouTube Studio
  96. LinkedIn Marketing Solutions
  97. LinkedIn Help
  98. Pinterest Business
  99. Pinterest Business Help
  100. Snapchat for Business
  101. X for Business
  102. Reddit communities
  103. Reddit for Business Help
  104. ASCAP
  105. BMI
  106. SESAC
  107. Global Music Rights
  108. PRS for Music (UK)
  109. PPL (UK)
  110. SOCAN (Canada)
  111. APRA AMCOS (Australia)
  112. GEMA (Germany)
  113. SACEM (France)
  114. SIAE (Italy)
  115. JASRAC (Japan)
  116. IFPI
  117. RIAA
  118. National Music Publishers Association
  119. Harry Fox Agency
  120. SoundExchange
  121. Music Reports
  122. Epidemic Sound
  123. Artlist
  124. Soundstripe
  125. PremiumBeat
  126. AudioJungle
  127. Free Music Archive
  128. Creative Commons
  129. Incompetech
  130. FTC: advertising and marketing
  131. FTC: disclosures 101
  132. FTC: endorsement guides
  133. FTC: consumer reviews rule
  134. FTC: advertising FAQs
  135. US Copyright Office
  136. US Copyright Office: DMCA
  137. US Copyright Office: music FAQ
  138. US Copyright Office: fair use FAQ
  139. USPTO: trademarks
  140. UK Advertising Standards Authority
  141. ACCC (Australia)
  142. Competition Bureau Canada
  143. GDPR overview
  144. California Consumer Privacy Act
  145. COPPA
  146. FTC: children’s privacy
  147. W3C Web Accessibility Initiative
  148. W3C: WCAG
  149. W3C: captions
  150. W3C: making audio and video accessible
  151. ADA.gov
  152. WebAIM
  153. Epilepsy Foundation
  154. Pew Research: internet and technology
  155. DataReportal
  156. US Census Bureau
  157. US Bureau of Labor Statistics
  158. Interactive Advertising Bureau
  159. Think with Google
  160. Google Trends
  161. Nielsen insights
  162. Schema.org: VideoObject
  163. Schema.org: SocialMediaPosting
  164. Schema.org: MusicRecording
  165. Schema.org: HowTo
  166. Schema.org: FAQPage
  167. Schema.org: Organization
  168. Google: video best practices
  169. Google: video structured data
  170. CapCut
  171. Adobe Premiere Rush
  172. DaVinci Resolve
  173. Canva
  174. Descript
  175. VEED
  176. Kapwing
  177. Otter.ai
  178. Later
  179. Buffer
  180. Hootsuite
  181. Sprout Social
  182. Google Analytics
  183. Google Search Console
  184. Google Analytics developer docs
  185. GA4: events and conversions
  186. Matomo
  187. Plausible Analytics
  188. Similarweb
  189. UK Information Commissioner’s Office
  190. Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
  191. Australian OAIC
  192. European Data Protection Board
  193. EU data protection
  194. EU Digital Services Act
  195. Ofcom
  196. FCC
  197. AIGA
  198. Nielsen Norman Group
  199. Smashing Magazine
  200. web.dev
  201. MDN: web media
  202. MDN: the video element
  203. ISO 21001 (reference)
  204. Buma/Stemra (Netherlands)
  205. STIM (Sweden)
  206. Teosto (Finland)
  207. Koda (Denmark)
  208. TONO (Norway)
  209. IMRO (Ireland)
  210. SGAE (Spain)
  211. ZAiKS (Poland)
  212. KOMCA (South Korea)
  213. MCSC (China)
  214. CISAC
  215. World Intellectual Property Organization
  216. TikTok: creating videos
  217. TikTok: exploring videos
  218. TikTok: privacy settings
  219. TikTok: growing your audience
  220. TikTok Creator Academy
  221. TikTok Effect House
  222. TikTok for small business
  223. Instagram: Reels help
  224. YouTube: Shorts best practice
  225. How YouTube recommends
  226. Pinterest Predicts
  227. Snapchat for Business
  228. Hootsuite blog
  229. Social Media Examiner
  230. Marketing Week
  231. Adweek
  232. Google Search Essentials — SEO starter guide
  233. Google: creating helpful, reliable, people-first content
  234. Google: intro to structured data
  235. Google: LocalBusiness structured data
  236. Google: FAQPage structured data
  237. Google: Article structured data
  238. Google: Product structured data
  239. Google: title links in search results
  240. Google: control your snippets
  241. Google: robots.txt introduction
  242. Google: sitemaps overview
  243. Google: consolidate duplicate URLs
  244. Google: redirects and Search
  245. Google: JavaScript SEO basics
  246. Google: multi-regional and multilingual sites
  247. Google Search Central Blog
  248. Google: get started with Search Console
  249. Google: how local search results are determined
  250. Google Business Profile: prohibited and restricted content
  251. Google Business Profile: address and service area guidelines
  252. Google Business Profile: review policy
  253. Google Business Profile: add or edit categories
  254. US Census Bureau QuickFacts: New Jersey
  255. US Census Bureau: American Community Survey
  256. US Census: Statistics of US Businesses
  257. Bureau of Labor Statistics: New Jersey data
  258. BLS: Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics
  259. NJ Department of Labor: labor market information
  260. New Jersey Business Action Center
  261. US Small Business Administration: New Jersey district
  262. USA.gov: business resources
  263. FTC: CAN-SPAM Act compliance guide
  264. FCC: telemarketing and robocall rules (TCPA)
  265. FTC endorsement guides — reviews and testimonials
  266. FTC: rule on consumer reviews and testimonials
  267. HHS: HIPAA guidance on online tracking technologies
  268. New Jersey Courts: attorney advertising guidelines
  269. New Jersey DCA: construction codes and permits
  270. New Jersey Home Improvement Contractor registration
  271. New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs

Get a free marketing proposal

Tell us what you are trying to grow and we will come back with a plan, not a pitch deck. Same-day reply on weekdays.

Our website uses cookies from third party services to improve your browsing experience. Read more about this and how you can control cookies by clicking "Privacy Preferences".
Privacy Preferences
When you visit our website, it may store information through your browser from specific services, usually in form of cookies. Here you can change your privacy preferences. Please note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our website and the services we offer.
Privacy Policy
You have read and agreed to our privacy policy
Required